Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Enterprise VS RhodeCode

Compare GitHub Enterprise VS RhodeCode and see what are their differences

GitHub Enterprise logo GitHub Enterprise

The on-premises version of GitHub, which you can deploy and manage in your own, secure environment

RhodeCode logo RhodeCode

Enterprise source code management platform for behind-the-firewall Mercurial, Git & Subversion. Secure and Open Source.
  • GitHub Enterprise Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22
  • RhodeCode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-16

GitHub Enterprise features and specs

  • Scalability
    GitHub Enterprise can handle large teams and repositories, making it suitable for organizations with extensive development needs.
  • Enhanced Security
    Offers advanced security features such as mandatory 2FA, LDAP integration, and SAML single sign-on, providing enterprises with greater control and protection of their codebases.
  • Dedicated Support
    Provides access to GitHub's dedicated support team, offering quicker and more specialized assistance than what is available in the free or lower-tier plans.
  • Compliance and Auditing
    Includes features that aid in compliance with industry standards and auditing capabilities, which are essential for enterprises needing to meet regulatory requirements.
  • On-Premises Deployment
    Allows for on-premises deployment, which is ideal for companies with strict data residency requirements or those that need to integrate tightly with their existing infrastructure.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Enterprise

  • Cost
    GitHub Enterprise is significantly more expensive than GitHub's other offerings, which might be a barrier for startups or smaller businesses.
  • Complex Setup
    The on-premises version of GitHub Enterprise can have a more complex setup and maintenance process, requiring dedicated IT resources.
  • Overhead
    Enterprises might encounter administrative overhead when managing large teams, including configuring and maintaining various integrations and security settings.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with GitHub may face a learning curve, particularly when navigating the more advanced features of the Enterprise version.
  • Dependency on Network Infrastructure
    The performance and reliability of an on-premises GitHub Enterprise deployment can be affected by the company’s network infrastructure, necessitating reliable hardware and connectivity.

RhodeCode features and specs

  • Unified Repository Management
    RhodeCode supports Git, Mercurial, and Subversion repositories, providing a flexible solution for organizations using multiple version control systems.
  • Enhanced Security
    It includes fine-grained permissions and access controls, ensuring robust security for repositories and code bases.
  • Enterprise Features
    It offers features like audit logs, compliance support, and LDAP/Active Directory integration, which are crucial for enterprise environments.
  • Integrations
    RhodeCode integrates with popular tools like Jira, Jenkins, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and workflow automation.
  • Self-hosted
    Being self-hosted, RhodeCode provides full control over data, which is essential for organizations with strict compliance or security requirements.
  • Community and Support
    RhodeCode offers a strong community support and comprehensive documentation, along with professional support options.

Possible disadvantages of RhodeCode

  • Complexity
    Setting up and maintaining a self-hosted instance can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring experienced personnel.
  • Cost
    While there is a community edition, the enterprise edition with the full feature set can be expensive.
  • User Interface
    Some users might find the user interface less intuitive compared to modern cloud-based solutions like GitHub or GitLab.
  • Performance
    Depending on the server infrastructure, performance might lag when handling very large repositories or a high number of concurrent users.
  • Limited Cloud Options
    Unlike some competitors, RhodeCode does not offer a fully managed cloud-hosted version, which could be a drawback for those looking for minimal maintenance.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with hosted version control systems might face a steep learning curve when adopting RhodeCode.

GitHub Enterprise videos

A look at the new GitHub Enterprise

More videos:

  • Review - Bring innovation to work with GitHub Enterprise
  • Review - Running GitHub Enterprise at scale in your organization - GitHub Satellite 2019

RhodeCode videos

Introduction to RhodeCode - Part 1. Installation

More videos:

  • Review - Rhodecode issue 372

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Enterprise and RhodeCode)
Git
27 27%
73% 73
Code Collaboration
30 30%
70% 70
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Enterprise and RhodeCode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Enterprise seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Enterprise mentions (10)

  • A checklist and guide to get your repository collaboration-ready
    Internal is a special visibility level used by GitHub Enterprise, allowing anyone inside your organization to see the repository, but nobody in the outside world. We generally suggest this as the default level for company projects that don’t have siloed sensitive information (such as customer-specific data or logic that only a specific group should know about). - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Github Actions to deploy your Terraform code
    If the company you work for has subscribed to Github, you probably benefit from a more substantial offer with additional features (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise). - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • hE Is nOT qUaLifIeD!
    Some orgs run GitHub Enterprise on-prem. Set up properly, it's not publicly accessible at all. Source: about 2 years ago
  • hE Is nOT qUaLifIeD!
    I do. My company has an enterprise license and it basically just acts as a private corner of normal public-facing github. Basically like a private repo but instead of being scoped to a single repo it's a full multi-organization scope. All new report default to private, but can be flipped to public if we want to open-source some internal project. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is there a microsoft TFS equivalent from Github?
    Https://github.com/enterprise you can host it yourself or in the cloud. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

RhodeCode mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RhodeCode yet. Tracking of RhodeCode recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Enterprise and RhodeCode, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

GitBucket - GitBucket is the easily installable open-source GitHub clone written with Scala.

SourceHut - Git and Mercurial hosting, mailing lists, bug tracking, continuous integration, and more