Git Large File Storage

Website

git-lfs.com

$ Details

Categories

#Git #Development #Code Collaboration #iPhone

Git Flow

Website

atlassian.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Development #Git #Code Collaboration #Git Tools

Git Large File Storage features and specs

• Efficient Large File Handling
  Git LFS replaces large files with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a separate server, thus optimizing repository size and performance.
• Reduced Clone Time
  By keeping the large file content separate, clone times are significantly reduced as only pointers are initially fetched.
• Better Storage Management
  Actual large files are stored on an external server, allowing for more efficient use of local disk space.
• Easier Collaboration
  Facilitates collaboration on repositories containing large files by preventing performance issues typically associated with large repositories.

Possible disadvantages of Git Large File Storage

• Requires Additional Setup
  Using Git LFS involves extra configuration and infrastructure setup, which could be challenging for new users or small teams.
• Limited Free Storage
  Most Git host providers have storage limits and may charge for additional space, which can lead to extra costs.
• Compatibility Issues
  Some Git clients and services might not fully support Git LFS, leading to possible compatibility issues.
• Complexity in Managing LFS Files
  Some operations, such as moving large files between branches or repositories, can be more complex compared to handling regular files.

Git Flow features and specs

• Structured Release Model
  Git Flow provides a well-defined structure with dedicated branches for development, feature work, releases, and hotfixes, which can help teams manage and track their work more effectively.
• Parallel Development
  It supports parallel development by allowing multiple feature branches to be worked on simultaneously without interfering with each other.
• Stable Releases
  The release branch allows for thorough testing and stabilization before a release, helping ensure that issues are minimized in production.
• Isolated Environments
  By using long-lived branches like develop and master, it allows for clean separation of completed and in-progress work.

Possible disadvantages of Git Flow

• Complexity
  The workflow can become quite complex, especially for small teams or projects, requiring discipline in branch management and merging.
• Overhead
  Maintaining multiple long-lived branches and frequent merges can introduce significant overhead, particularly in less automated environments.
• Not Ideal for Continuous Delivery
  Git Flow may not be the best fit for continuous delivery environments, as its focus on release branches could slow down the process of deploying small, frequent updates.
• Delayed Integration
  Feature branches can stay open for extended periods, leading to larger, riskier merges into the develop branch if integration isn’t done regularly.

#GitHub_Git Large File Storage (LFS) Files Upload to GitHub By Git GUI Here

Git Flow Is A Bad Idea