Based on our record, Alpine.js should be more popular than Gio UI. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
> At least with a language like Go, it somewhat makes sense, and has been attempted: https://gioui.org/ Gio UI is an immediate-mode UI, and immediate-mode UIs map very nicely to Rust. Egui is quite easy to use. https://www.egui.rs/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I didn't bash Java/Kotlin. In fact, I have written few android apps in Kotlin, Java and I also have fiddled with Jetpack compose, JNI and NDK (I have also played with mpv's Opengl/Vulkan's rendering on Android if that matters to you). I don't want to share the projects of mine because I don't want to reveal my identity. > https://gioui.org/ I know that tailscale's android application is written in it but I don't... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Tell me you've never done any Android development, without telling me... This is such a low-effort "take" without any effort to justify _why_ you'd want something like this. There's a high amount of impedance mismatch trying to write GUIs in a non-GC language like Rust which _has_ to run on what's essentially a Java VM (ART). At least with a language like Go, it somewhat makes sense, and has been attempted:... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I am building the same but with golang and https://gioui.org/. Source: 11 months ago
I've been writing a WASM app using gio & I found myself wanting for a simplified web library. In addition I drew some inspiration from leptos server functions. A friend of mine mentioned it has some similarities with next.js. Source: 11 months ago
✨ In recent months, I have been developing web projects using GOTTHA stack: Go + Templ + Tailwind CSS + htmx + Alpine.js. As soon as I'm ready to talk about all the subtleties and pitfalls, I'll post it on my social networks. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
> But honestly, torn towards htmx but undecided. We are in the middle of migrating from our monster react application into server rendered pages (with jinja2). The velocity at which we are able to ship and the reduction of complexity has been great so far. Managing client side state for simple things like (is the dropdown open/closed), listening to keyboard events and such can be done with something like alpine-js... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I would say - htmx (https://htmx.org/) - Alpine.js (https://alpinejs.dev/) both are minimal and very easy to get started. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Sure, you can use any number of JS-avoidance libraries. I'm a fan of Turbo, and there's also htmx, Unpoly, Alpine, hyperscript, swup, barba.js, and probably others. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Direct DOM, but with a library. Specifically AlpineJS since it follows Vue closely in design practices allowing me to scale into a full web application if necessary (basically swapping to Vue takes minimal work). The Morph plugin is specifically what I like using. Source: 6 months ago
Fyne - The Fyne toolkit is an easy to learn, free and open source, platform for building graphical applications for desktop, mobile and beyond.
htmx - high power tools for HTML
SQLPage - Build SQL-only websites - Build full web applications using just SQL queries
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
Slick - A jquery plugin for creating slideshows and carousels into your webpage.
Stimulus - A modest JavaScript framework for the HTML you already have, by Basecamp