Fzf plugs into almost every alias I have including shell history, which allows me to operate in the CLI using 1-5 keystrokes instead of typing out extremely long commands. Here's a good tutorial of using FZF. - Source: dev.to / about 20 hours ago

If you want to integrate fzf with rg, fd, bat to fuzzy find files, directories or ripgrep the content of a file and preview using bat, but the fzf document only has commands for Linux shell (bash,...), and you want to achieve that on your Windows Machine using Powershell, this post may be for you. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

I have removed limit for bash history lines and file size and am using https://github.com/junegunn/fzf for reverse-search. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

Those are the most used aliases in my gitconfig. "git fza" shows a list of modified/new files in an fzf window, and you can select each file with tab plus arrow keys. When you hit enter, those files are fed into "git add". Needs fzf: https://github.com/junegunn/fzf. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

> my history is so noisy I had to find another way The fzf search syntax can help, if you become familiar with it. It is also supported in atuin [2]. [1]: https://github.com/junegunn/fzf#search-syntax. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly. However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Sorry for the hijack, but I've been using xonsh[1] since 2018. It's a shell with Python syntax. If you dislike Bash scripting, and know Python, please consider this! [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience? It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands. I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh? https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Not to hijack, but also consider xonsh[1]. It's Python based, and all your scripts can be Python (or hybrid-Python). I've been using it for both Windows and Linux for over 5 years. [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago