Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Fudo VS SSHy

Compare Fudo VS SSHy and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Fudo logo Fudo

With Fudo, users can get access to Unix/Windows servers, applications and devices quickly and easily.

SSHy logo SSHy

SSHy is a HTML5 SSHv2 web client implementing E2E encryption that runs well on modern web browsers.
Not present
  • SSHy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Fudo features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

SSHy features and specs

  • Web-Based Interface
    SSHy provides a convenient web-based interface for SSH, allowing users to access remote systems directly from a browser without needing a dedicated SSH client.
  • Portability
    Since SSHy is web-based, it can be accessed from any device with a browser, making it highly portable and versatile for users on different platforms.
  • No Installation Required
    Users do not need to install any software on their local machines, reducing setup time and maintenance requirements.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    As a web application, SSHy supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, through any modern web browser.

Possible disadvantages of SSHy

  • Security Concerns
    Running an SSH client in a web browser can introduce security vulnerabilities, especially if the web server hosting SSHy is not properly secured.
  • Browser Dependency
    The functionality and performance of SSHy may vary depending on the web browser being used, potentially leading to inconsistencies.
  • Limited Feature Set
    Web-based SSH clients like SSHy may not provide all the advanced features available in dedicated SSH clients, which may be required for certain use cases.
  • Network Dependency
    Since SSHy requires a network connection to the host server, it may not be ideal in environments with unreliable or limited connectivity.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fudo and SSHy)

Fudo

SSHy

SSH
38 38%
SSH
62% 62
Server Management
38 38%
Server Management
62% 62
Governance, Risk And Compliance
100 100%
Governance, Risk And Compliance
0% 0
Terminal Tools
0 0%
Terminal Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fudo and SSHy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fudo and SSHy, you can also consider the following products

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

Wetty - Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.

strongDM - Trust strongDM to manage an engineers access to everything

Shell In A Box - Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...

TinyShell - TinyShell is an open source UNIX backdoor.

Guacamole - Access your computers from anywhere. Because the Guacamole client is an HTML5 web application, use of your computers is not tied to any one device or location. As long as you have access to a web browser, you have access to your machines.

Loading...