Foundation for Emails 2 VS Tcpdf

Things like Foundation for Emails helped me a lot when I used to make email templates. Source: 10 months ago

I will say that it sucks just as a much from the developer front. I had to build some email templates for a project a few weeks ago and I was shocked how wired it was compared to regular webdev. Using a framework is almost a requirement if you don't want to spend all your time on little differences between email clients. The layout is really wired too, with the recommendation to use a ton of nested tables. Not to... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I use foundation email framework and integrate it into the emails folder and have mix run its build. Source: over 1 year ago

Https://mjml.io/ Https://get.foundation/emails.html. Source: almost 2 years ago

I've used https://get.foundation/emails.html but email dev is a nightmare. It's like needing to support 20 different versions of IE6 each with their own unique bugs you have to work around. I said this in another comment:. Source: almost 2 years ago

TCPDF has full support for rendering an EPS into a PDF. It can be fussy. https://tcpdf.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Idk what’s the big problem. Maybe it’s just something like https://tcpdf.org ? Using that for years. Source: about 1 year ago

Running a headless browser to render HTML is a resource intensive task. If you only need to generate simple documents, you're better off using a tool that generates PDF directly. In the old days we used FPDF and its successors (TCPDF was the most popular). Both seem to have recent releases. There's also mPDF , that seems to be another child of FPDF. Source: about 1 year ago

You may want to look at a PDF library (Python/PHP/Perl/Java, etc.) You can do all you mention with a lot of flexibility. Tcpdf comes immediately to mind, there is also a Python port. If you want to learn a language, I recommend python. Learning how to make a basic program when it is something that you want, and you know what you want is a great way to learn. Source: almost 2 years ago

The original site still has it available for download, but most importantly, a ton of examples and documentation, that while I haven't tried the github version, probably works based on the same as the old. Source: almost 2 years ago