Based on our record, Backbone.js should be more popular than Foundation for Emails 2. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Things like Foundation for Emails helped me a lot when I used to make email templates. Source: almost 2 years ago
I will say that it sucks just as a much from the developer front. I had to build some email templates for a project a few weeks ago and I was shocked how wired it was compared to regular webdev. Using a framework is almost a requirement if you don't want to spend all your time on little differences between email clients. The layout is really wired too, with the recommendation to use a ton of nested tables. Not to... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
I use foundation email framework and integrate it into the emails folder and have mix run its build. Source: almost 3 years ago
Https://mjml.io/ Https://get.foundation/emails.html. Source: almost 3 years ago
I've used https://get.foundation/emails.html but email dev is a nightmare. It's like needing to support 20 different versions of IE6 each with their own unique bugs you have to work around. I said this in another comment:. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://backbonejs.org/#View There is also a github repo that has examples of MVC patterns adapted to the web platform. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Got it thanks for the context. I've read the web app and it seems to me it is just https://backbonejs.org/ re-written in Typescript and allows JSX. I'm very certain Typescript and JSX will have improved the DX for Backbone like apps, but it doesn't address all of the other issues that teams had with Backbone. e.g. Cyclical event propagation, state stored in the DOM (i.e. Appendchild is error prone in large code... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Even further nowadays, docs are created using Docusaurus. I don't have problem with it but documentation should be good (eye) friendly than easy to write. Why not be creative while writing docs such as - Backbone.js - https://backbonejs.org Or https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html as code annotation. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
What we see, a decade ago, are that many of the "popular" libraries, frameworks, and methods, not surprisingly, have gone by the wayside, a lot that have remained in current code as difficult-to-removemodernize legacy cruft (Bower, Gulp, Grunt, Backbone, Angular 1, ...), and then we have the small minority that are still here. Some that remain have had their utility lessened/questioned by platform and language... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
MJML - The open source framework for responsive emails
AngularJS - AngularJS lets you extend HTML vocabulary for your application. The resulting environment is extraordinarily expressive, readable, and quick to develop.
HTMLEmail.io - Responsive HTML email templates for startups & developers
ExpressJS - Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
MJML App - The only app that makes responsive email easy
ember.js - A JavaScript framework for creating ambitious web apps