Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Foswiki VS Hugo

Compare Foswiki VS Hugo and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Foswiki logo Foswiki

Foswiki is the free and open source enterprise collaboration platform.

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • Foswiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-28
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

Foswiki videos

+ Add

Lonely Data vs Linked Data (with Foswiki)

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Foswiki Tutorial - How to create a new user
  • Tutorial - Vadim Belman - "Foswiki, And How To Redesign 20 Years Old Code"

Hugo videos

+ Add

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Foswiki and Hugo)

Foswiki

Hugo

Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
Blogging
100% 100
WiKi
100 100%
WiKi
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
Static Site Generators
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Foswiki and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Foswiki and Hugo

Foswiki Reviews

We have no reviews of Foswiki yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
If you are looking for a powerful static website generator, Hugo is a good alternative to Next.js. You can build multilingual websites much faster and in a simple way that no other platform will offer you. Furthermore, this platform will increase your experience in creating websites with beautiful Markdown syntax and pre-built features like commenting.
Source: www.zegocloud.com
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
Certainly. Jekyll and Hugo are popular static site generators that don’t rely on React.js. Jekyll uses Ruby, while Hugo is renowned for its speed and simplicity. These options are excellent for projects focusing on content-driven sites without heavy JavaScript frameworks.
Source: tms-outsource.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Source: www.freecodecamp.org
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Foswiki. While we know about 358 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Foswiki. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Foswiki mentions (4)

  • Making a Company Directory
    Use FOSWiki. It's best suited for a corporate intranet, but has a learning curve. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Software for an organization, think 'teams' and 'sharepoint'
    The best software around is FOSWiki, which is an enterprise wiki with numerous plugins, eg for taking meeting notes, setting up workflows, searching, appending files to wiki pages, etc. The only drawback is that it comes as a blank page, but there are foswiki consultants available for this job. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Does anyone else create cooking "plans" before a large meal? What's that called?
    I host my own instance of https://foswiki.org/ on my home linux box. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Recommendations: Standard Compliance Audit software
    Use an enterprise wiki with forms and workflows. A lot of work to customise the system, but if you use FOSwiki, you can use pattern matching queries to extract the standards from the text of a page (eg from documentation), having the advantage that whenever you edit the documentation, the standards (and questions) change automatically ;-) You should think about versioning, though. Source: almost 3 years ago

Hugo mentions (358)

  • Cloud Resume Challenge - Chunk 3
    This required me to revisit my Hugo website. I opened up the developer tools in Edge to figure out which section was which to decide where I wanted to place my hit counter. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
  • Cloud Resume Challenge Chunk 1
    I am not a front-end web developer, and UI/UX design is not one of my skills. So, rather than fumble around trying to make my resume webpage look good, I decided to use a static website generator. I chose to use Hugo, since they have a lot of templates to choose from. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to deploy your own website on AWS
    Hugo Existing themes will get you a website quick, such that you only have to modify color schemes and layouts. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
  • Good alternatives to Heroku
    And last but not least, Netlify, which is the one I use to host this website(for free). Hugo + Netlify is a powerful combination. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Foswiki and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

WackoWiki - WackoWiki is a light and easy to install multilingual Wiki-engine.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Loading...