FORM.com VS Chai

FORM.com Reviews

1. Maia Andradji    

   almost 4 years ago
   The software have been great. By far has the most customizable features of all its competitors

   We spent a long time looking for a product that could capture data online and offline, add logic and validation to the forms, empower our team to build their own questionnaires and also allow us to host the system in our own data center. We finally found form.com and the implementation was straight forwards and ongoing support has met our requirements as our userbase has grown.

   👍 Pros:    Great set of functions|Third party service integration

Chai Reviews

FORM.com mentions (0)

Chai mentions (4)

• 10V ethereum hardhat : create a project

  Mocha as the test runner, Chai as the assertion library, and the Hardhat Chai Matchers to extend Chai with contracts-related functionality. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Unit Testing Essentials for Express API: A Step-by-Step Guide

  Assertion library we used: Chai (comes with a lot of plugins worth exploring). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Creating a Chai like assertion library using proxies

  While this is fine and I could have perfectly moved all my tests to use said assertion style, I like the descriptive way Jest tests look like. As a quick way to maintain certain similarity I reached for ChaiJS, an assertion library that is mainly used with mocha. Chai offers expect like assertions that can arguably be more descriptive than Jest’s. Instead of writing expect(…).toBe(true), you’d write... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• API Testing Tools in JavaScript

  The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago