FORM.com VS Caesium Image Compressor

FORM.com Reviews

1. Maia Andradji

   almost 4 years ago
   The software have been great. By far has the most customizable features of all its competitors

   We spent a long time looking for a product that could capture data online and offline, add logic and validation to the forms, empower our team to build their own questionnaires and also allow us to host the system in our own data center. We finally found form.com and the implementation was straight forwards and ongoing support has met our requirements as our userbase has grown.

   👍 Pros:    Great set of functions|Third party service integration

Caesium Image Compressor Reviews

FORM.com mentions (0)

Caesium Image Compressor mentions (10)

• Easy boxart resizing with imagemagick in your browser. No install, no CLI!

  I also use Caesium Image Compressor on my ROMs and Themes folder to reduce their size and improve the RG35XX's responsiveness. Source: about 1 year ago

• Just upgraded. Any tips to share?

  If you want further compression you could check out Caesium Image Compressor which is free (and I'm not affiliated with it incidentally, I just like it). Source: about 1 year ago

• Is there any way to fix this? no pictures i have are under 8mb and it won’t auto compress to 8mb. i effectively cannot send pictures in my group chat

  Try an image compression tool, this one is free and open source: https://saerasoft.com/caesium/. Source: about 1 year ago

• Looking for OFFLINE PNG/JPEG compressor software for Win10.

  Caesium Image Compressor can do the job and it is easy to use. There is also imagemagick which is basically the swiss-knife for image editing, but based on you having looked for websites first, I assume you don't look for a commandline tool (imagemagick is a commandline tool). Source: about 2 years ago

• Best Image export setting for Website(Squarespace)

  I can recommend Caesium , a utility (Windows, MAC version in Alpha test) to remove all EXIF, metadata etc which will reduce your JPG in size quite a lot without using higher JPG-compression (lower quality). Source: almost 3 years ago