Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Forcepoint Web Security VS JSON Web Token

Compare Forcepoint Web Security VS JSON Web Token and see what are their differences

Forcepoint Web Security logo Forcepoint Web Security

Seguridad Web De Última Generación Para La Fuerza Laboral Global Del Futuro

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.
  • Forcepoint Web Security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

Forcepoint Web Security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Web Protection
    Forcepoint Web Security offers robust protection against web-based threats, including malware, phishing, and ransomware. Its advanced threat detection capabilities and real-time analytics help in identifying and mitigating threats effectively.
  • Cloud & On-Premises Options
    The solution provides flexible deployment options, allowing organizations to choose between cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid models to suit their infrastructure and operational needs.
  • Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    Integrated DLP capabilities help in preventing sensitive information from being leaked or accessed by unauthorized users. This is crucial for organizations that need to comply with data protection regulations.
  • User Behavior Analytics
    The platform includes user behavior analytics (UBA) to monitor and analyze user activities. This helps in identifying risky behaviors and potential insider threats, enhancing overall security posture.
  • Scalability
    Designed to scale easily with growing organizations, Forcepoint Web Security can accommodate increasing numbers of users and devices without compromising performance or protection.

Possible disadvantages of Forcepoint Web Security

  • Cost
    The solution can be relatively expensive, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises. Licensing and subscription costs may be a concern for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Complexity
    The comprehensive nature of the solution can make it complex to configure and manage. Organizations may require dedicated IT personnel or professional services to fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Performance Impact
    Depending on the deployment and configuration, users may experience performance degradation, especially if the network infrastructure is not robust enough to handle the additional load.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to the platform might find there is a steep learning curve, requiring training and time to become proficient in using all features and effectively managing the system.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Forcepoint Web Security with existing IT infrastructure and other security tools may pose challenges, particularly in complex or heterogeneous environments.

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Forcepoint Web Security videos

Forcepoint Web Security Cloud Features

JSON Web Token videos

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Forcepoint Web Security and JSON Web Token)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Identity Provider
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management

User comments

Share your experience with using Forcepoint Web Security and JSON Web Token. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 300 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Forcepoint Web Security mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Forcepoint Web Security yet. Tracking of Forcepoint Web Security recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JSON Web Token mentions (300)

  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Authentication and Authorization Best Practices in ASP.NET Core
    You can decode the created JWT token using JWT IO web site to see what's inside. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Use JWT Token In React JS
    JWT.io – A great resource to decode, verify, and generate JWT tokens. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 12 Must-Have Online Tools for Every Web Developer in 2025
    Category: Token Debugging & Authentication Link: jwt.io. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Forcepoint Web Security and JSON Web Token, you can also consider the following products

Cisco Umbrella - Cisco Umbrella is a cloud security platform that provides the first line of defense against threats on the internet.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways - Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers secure internet access for the employees.

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...

McAfee SmartFilter - McAfee Web Protection is a web security solution that includes an on-premises secure web gateway and SaaS-based web security delivered from the cloud.

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication