Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways VS JSON Web Token

Compare Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways VS JSON Web Token and see what are their differences

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways logo Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers secure internet access for the employees.

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.
  • Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways features and specs

  • Comprehensive Protection
    Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways offers extensive security measures including anti-malware, anti-phishing, and web control, providing robust protection against a wide range of threats.
  • Real-time Traffic Scanning
    The solution includes real-time scanning of web traffic, ensuring that threats are detected and neutralized before they can infiltrate the network.
  • High Performance and Low Latency
    Despite its comprehensive security features, the software is optimized for high performance, resulting in minimal impact on network speed and user experience.
  • Cloud-Assisted Intelligence
    Utilizes cloud-assisted technology for real-time threat intelligence and updates, ensuring the most current protection against emerging threats.
  • Customizable Policies
    Allows network administrators to set and customize security policies according to their specific organizational needs and compliance requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways

  • Complexity in Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require advanced IT knowledge or professional assistance.
  • Subscription and Licensing Costs
    Ongoing subscription and licensing fees can be relatively high, especially for small to medium-sized businesses with limited budgets.
  • Resource-Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially requiring more robust hardware to handle peak loads effectively.
  • Potential for False Positives
    There is a possibility of false positives where legitimate traffic can be mistakenly flagged as malicious, potentially disrupting business operations.
  • Vendor Trust Concerns
    Due to geopolitical factors and concerns about privacy implications, some organizations may hesitate to use Kaspersky products.

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways videos

No Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

JSON Web Token videos

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and JSON Web Token)
Cyber Security
100 100%
0% 0
Identity Provider
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Identity And Access Management

User comments

Share your experience with using Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and JSON Web Token. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 300 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways yet. Tracking of Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JSON Web Token mentions (300)

  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Authentication and Authorization Best Practices in ASP.NET Core
    You can decode the created JWT token using JWT IO web site to see what's inside. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Use JWT Token In React JS
    JWT.io – A great resource to decode, verify, and generate JWT tokens. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 12 Must-Have Online Tools for Every Web Developer in 2025
    Category: Token Debugging & Authentication Link: jwt.io. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kaspersky Security for Internet Gateways and JSON Web Token, you can also consider the following products

Cisco Umbrella - Cisco Umbrella is a cloud security platform that provides the first line of defense against threats on the internet.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

McAfee SmartFilter - McAfee Web Protection is a web security solution that includes an on-premises secure web gateway and SaaS-based web security delivered from the cloud.

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

OpenDNS Umbrella - Cloud Security

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...