Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flatfile VS DocRaptor

Compare Flatfile VS DocRaptor and see what are their differences

Flatfile logo Flatfile

The new standard for data import

DocRaptor logo DocRaptor

As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more
Visit Website
  • Flatfile Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • DocRaptor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-06-30

Uniquely Powerful PDF Generation

Only DocRaptor's HTML-to-PDF API has these advanced styling and layout capabilities:

Easy Headers & Footers

Instead of a separate HTML file, DocRaptor headers and footers are part of your document HTML. And easily show (or hide) different headers and footers for different pages.

Mixed Layout, Sizes & Headers

DocRaptor lets you control the style, sizing, headers, and layouts of individual pages in your document. You can even style left and right pages differently, or the first and last pages.

CSS Flexbox

DocRaptor lets you make PDFs with advanced CSS layout tools, including flexbox. You won't need to radically adjust your website to get a great PDF.

Accessible, Tagged PDFs

Create more accessible PDFs by using PDF profiles PDF/A-1a, PDF/A-3a, or PDF/UA-1. Tagged PDFs optimize the reading experience for assistive technology such as screen readers.

Fine-Tune Page Breaks

Our rendering engine was built specifically for making PDFs and we fully support CSS3 Paged Media. This allows much greater control over page breaks, especially when dealing with tables and images.

…and more!

Add crop marks, specify PDF bookmarks, or create standards-compliant documents.

Unmatched Scale & Reliability

We back our API with a 99.999% uptime guarantee. If you need reliability, DocRaptor is the service you can trust. We also have no limits on document input or output size.

Flatfile

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

DocRaptor

$ Details
paid Free Trial $15.0 / Monthly (125+ Documents)
Platforms
REST API PHP Java JavaScript Ruby Drupal Python Node JS Laravel Cross Platform .Net Generic HTTP API Cloud
Release Date
2010 May

Flatfile videos

Flatfile Portal Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Flatfile Overview - Data onboarding made easy

DocRaptor videos

No DocRaptor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flatfile and DocRaptor)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
PDF Tools
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
HTML To PDF
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flatfile and DocRaptor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flatfile and DocRaptor

Flatfile Reviews

We have no reviews of Flatfile yet.
Be the first one to post

DocRaptor Reviews

  1. Cool app

    I've been using it for a while. It's great to create contracts.

    🏁 Competitors: pdfmatrix.com
  2. Great app - resolves the limitations of other doc/merge apps

    We wanted an app that would allow for custom branding and layout, the font of our choice, and merge fields across our main SF objects. Previously we used DocGen, which led to a morass of configuration to put fields in exactly the place they needed to be for the tables, as well as a bunch of SOQL queries to manage conditional logic. The VF doc generator can't accommodate the fonts we use in our branding. And so DocRaptor has been the perfect solution.

    Our developer built the contracts, and we went live within weeks with complete branding, flexibility in the data merges (we were able to remove a ton of bad config) and it's easy to manage.

    👍 Pros:    Flexible|Great customer support|Super fast
  3. The best HTML to PDF solution

    I have been using DocRaptor for 6 years, both for my professionnal and personnal projects. After trying several free and/or open source HTML to PDF solutions, I was happy to find this service. It's the most efficient solution, which generates the most accurate PDF documents.

    Since it's a SaaS service, there is nothing to install, no library dependencies nor experimental software that you're not sure it will be supported in the future.

    There is a lot of options and CSS rules to dig in if you want to get PDF files that exactly matches what you want. But the other solutions I tried didn't have these options, and the result was not good enough.

    👍 Pros:    Simple api|No dependencies|Best pdf result|A lot of options to help you create the pdf you need|Good customer support
    👎 Cons:    A lot of css rules to learn if you want to get the perfect pdf of your dreams... but at least these rules exist!

14 Best PDF APIs for Every Business Need
DocRaptor is an HTML-to-PDF API that empowers you with unmatched scalability and reliability. Even if you need thousands of PDF documents every day, it can handle your requirements. It also guarantees 99.999% uptime and has no restrictions on the input and output size of the files.
Source: geekflare.com
Best BFO Java PDF Library Alternatives (2024) for your project
DocRaptor is a service that is hosted in the cloud and generates PDF documents from HTML and CSS in a seamless manner. Because it enables developers to easily convert web information into PDFs of excellent quality, it is a convenient solution for projects in which HTML-to-PDF conversion is a primary requirement.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flatfile should be more popular than DocRaptor. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flatfile mentions (7)

  • Was Y Combinator worth it?
    Not all that curious... https://flatfile.com If you're building a vertical SaaS and want to support import from a file, and don't want to spend time reinventing the wheel, this could be a big win. This would let new users bring in existing data from another SaaS (that supports CSV export) or where the incumbent is likely to be Excel. The development time it would take to make something like this solid, usable, and... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • How to integrate data import functionality into your app
    If you are a software developer, think about how you could add the data import, transformation, and validation functionality to your web app in only a few minutes with your JavaScript and React knowledge using built-in SDK and libraries. You can think of using SDK such as the front-end Embed React library in the Flatfile. If you need to define more complex data validation rules in a backend, you can request... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • YoBulk: Open Source CSV importer powered by GPT3 ( Free flatfile.com alternative )
    YoBulk is an open-source CSV importer for any SaaS application - It's a free alternative to https://flatfile.com/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: YoBulk – open-source GPT powered CSV importer[Flatfile.com alternative]
    Hey Everybody, We are really excited to open source YoBulk today. YoBulk is an open source CSV importer for any SaaS application - It's a free alternative to https://flatfile.com/ Why are we building YoBulk: In our previous startup, we were receiving CSV files from various billboard screen owners every day, following a specific template that we defined. Despite the well-defined template, the CSV files we received... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What have you built more than twice and wish someone had built for you?
    Spreadsheet data ingestion. Someone did built it, but it was years after: https://flatfile.com/ Not a plug. I'm unaffiliated and just impressed by it. Should've thought of it myself. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

DocRaptor mentions (4)

  • Launch HN: Onedoc (YC W24) – A better way to create PDFs
    It sounds like this is as advanced as DocRaptor[1]. They have what I consider to be the best PDF generation API, giving complete control over the documents you need to create. The pricing is similar. If you'd rather do it for free weasyprint[2] is the best open source alternative. Another more affordable option you might want to consider is Urlbox[3]. (Disclosure: I work on this) Urlbox's rendering engine is based... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • How do you generate PDF reports from HTML?
    We built the DocRaptor API to let developers have affordable access to the commercial Prince PDF engine. We have Node code examples throughout the documentation. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What is the best online HTML to PDF converter?
    I'd argue our service, DocRaptor, is the best because it's the only one powered by the Prince PDF engine. Unlike open-source, browser-based conversion engines, Prince was custom-built just for converting HTML into PDFs and offers a lot of unique functionality for making more complex PDFs. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is it possible to render a RazorPage (inc. CSS) to a PDF file and download via WebAPI?
    I work for https://docraptor.com, which is an HTML to PDF API. We have a C# agent. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flatfile and DocRaptor, you can also consider the following products

csvbox - Spreadsheet importer for your web app, SaaS or API

PDFCrowd - Pdfcrowd is a Web/HTML to PDF online service. Convert HTML to PDF online in the browser or in your PHP, Python, Ruby, .NET, Java apps via the REST API.

Backand - Backand is a backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and more.

pdflayer - Free, powerful HTML to PDF API supporting both URL and raw HTML conversion. Unlimited document size, lightning-fast and compatible PHP, Python, Ruby, etc.

DBngin - Free all-in-one database version management tool 🛠️

PDFShift - Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request