Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flask VS MLton

Compare Flask VS MLton and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Flask logo Flask

a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.

MLton logo MLton

MLton is an open-source, whole-program, optimizing Standard ML compiler
  • Flask Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • MLton Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-25

Flask features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Flask is a micro-framework, meaning it is lightweight, easy to understand, and simple to use. It requires minimal setup to get a web application up and running.
  • Flexibility
    Flask provides flexibility and control over the application's architecture, allowing developers to choose the components they need and avoid unnecessary bloat.
  • Extensibility
    Flask supports various extensions to add capabilities like database integration, form validation, and authentication without compromising its core simplicity.
  • Documentation
    Flask has comprehensive and well-organized documentation, making it easier for developers to learn and implement features effectively.
  • Community
    Flask has a large and active community, providing ample resources like tutorials, code snippets, and third-party libraries that can help speed up development.
  • Testing
    Flask is designed to be unit tested easily, allowing developers to test their applications and ensure reliability.

Possible disadvantages of Flask

  • Scalability
    Flask may not be as scalable as some other frameworks for very large applications due to its minimalist design and lack of built-in features.
  • Boilerplate Code
    Since Flask requires you to integrate and configure many components manually, codebases in Flask can sometimes contain a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Opinionated Architecture
    While Flask provides flexibility, it also means there are fewer conventions. Developers must make more architectural decisions, which can be challenging for large team collaboration.
  • Limited Tools
    Compared to more comprehensive frameworks, Flask offers fewer built-in tools and features, which may necessitate additional plugins or custom implementations.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Applications
    While Flask is easy to learn for simple applications, it can become complex to manage as the application grows, requiring a good understanding of design patterns and software architecture.

MLton features and specs

  • Performance
    MLton is known for producing highly optimized, efficient executables due to its whole-program compilation approach. This can result in faster performance compared to other Standard ML compilers.
  • Standard ML Compliance
    MLton has strong adherence to the Standard ML language specification, ensuring that programs written for MLton are highly portable and conform to the expected language standards.
  • Rich Optimization
    The compiler includes numerous optimization techniques, enabling better runtime performance and memory usage for compiled applications.
  • Large Language Support
    MLton supports the full breadth of the Standard ML language, including advanced features like functors and modules.

Possible disadvantages of MLton

  • Compilation Time
    Due to its whole-program optimization techniques, MLton can take longer to compile programs compared to other compilers that use separate compilation.
  • Executable Size
    Although MLton optimizes for performance, this can sometimes result in larger executable sizes than compilers that don't perform as many optimizations.
  • Limited Interactivity
    MLton is optimized for batch processing and does not provide interactive development features like a REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop), which can be a downside for some developers used to interactive programming environments.
  • Platform Availability
    While MLton supports several platforms, its availability may not be as widespread as other more commonly used programming environments, which could limit use in certain contexts.

Analysis of Flask

Overall verdict

  • Flask is a good choice for developers looking for a lightweight and flexible framework for building web applications, particularly if they value simplicity and control over out-of-the-box features.

Why this product is good

  • Flask is a microframework for Python, offering simplicity and flexibility, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications.
  • It has a simple core with easy-to-add extensions, allowing developers to customize their applications as needed.
  • Flask's lightweight nature means it has a small overhead, leading to faster development cycles and easier debugging.
  • It has a strong community and excellent documentation, providing ample resources for learning and troubleshooting.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer Python and want a minimalist approach to web development.
  • Those working on small to medium-sized applications or microservices.
  • Developers who appreciate a modular and extensible architecture.
  • Teams that require rapid prototyping or quick deployment cycles.

Flask videos

Built To Last A Life Time - Ragproper Modern Glass Flask Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Hip Flask Guide - Gentleman's Gazette
  • Review - 10 Best Flasks 2019

MLton videos

No MLton videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flask and MLton)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flask and MLton. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flask and MLton

Flask Reviews

The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Flask is the micro that’s got your back without trying to run the show. It comes with the essentials but trusts you to pick your tools — no baggage attached, truly Pythonic at heart.
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
25 Python Frameworks to Master
You’ll also have access to some extension packages like Flask-RESTful, which adds support for building powerful REST APIs, and Flask-SQLAlchemy, a convenient way to use SQLAlchemy in your flask app.
Source: kinsta.com
3 Web Frameworks to Use With Python
Flask is a micro web framework for building web applications with Python. Here is the official web page of Flask.
Top 10 Phoenix Framework Alternatives
Flask is a micro-framework, i.e., it does not bundle tools and libraries and instead uses third party libraries to deliver functionalities.

MLton Reviews

We have no reviews of MLton yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flask should be more popular than MLton. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flask mentions (42)

  • PSET 9 Finance - What is "disable response caching" and the function they ask to notice
    "After configuring Flask, notice how this file disables caching of responses (provided you’re in debugging mode, which you are by default in your code50 codespace), lest you make a change to some file but your browser not notice. ". Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to Send an Email in Python
    Flask, which offers a simple interface for email sending— Flask Mail. (Check here how to send emails with Flask). - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Plotting Bookmarks with Flask, Matplotlib, and OAuth 2.0
    Lang="en"> Plot Bookmarks!{% block title %}{% endblock %} rel="stylesheet" href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.2.1/css/bootstrap.min.css" /> class="container"> Plot Bookmarks by Date {% block containercontent %}{% endblock %} /> class="footer"> class="text-muted"> >This is a... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Determining what version of Flask is installed
    What's the easiest way to determine which version of Flask is installed? Source: about 3 years ago
  • What is the point of uWSGI?
    I'm looking at the WSGI specification and I'm trying to figure out how servers like uWSGI fit into the picture. I understand the point of the WSGI spec is to separate web servers like nginx from web applications like something you'd write using Flask. What I don't understand is what uWSGI is for. Why can't nginx directly call my Flask application? Can't flask speak WSGI directly to it? Why does uWSGI need to get... Source: about 3 years ago
View more

MLton mentions (5)

  • Simple JSON parser in c++, rust, ocaml, standard ml
    Once I got the parser ready in OCaml, I thought I port it to Standard ML, since it belong to the same ML language family. I was also curious on how well mlton could optimise it. The language lacks custom let bindings, so I resorted to use Result.bind manually. This makes code much less readable and more verbose. The standard library also lacks result type, so I had to come up with my own simple implementation.... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Ante: A low-level functional language
    If you’re fine with tracing GC (which depends on the situation, of course), Standard ML is a perfectly boring language (that IIUC predated and inspired Caml) and MLton[1] is a very nice optimizing compiler for it. The language is awkward at times (in particular, the separate sublanguage of modules can be downright unwieldy), and the library has some of the usual blind spots such as nonexistent Unicode support... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Write your own programming language in an hour with Chumsky
    Unfortunately, I haven't found a ton of "easily-digestible" and, at the same time, comprehensive guides on compiling functional languages. Generally you'll find a mix of blog posts/class notes/papers covering a single step. Some resources I like: - Andrew Kennedy's 2007 paper Compiling with Continuations, Continued [1]. This one is the most clear IMO - Andrew Appel's Compiling with Continuations book... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Why are imperative programs considered faster than their functional counterparts?
    More broadly, they can be fast even without such extensions if they aggressively pursue optimization opportunities afforded by static typing, like MLton for example, but that also impacts compilation performance negatively. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Coalton: How to Have Our (Typed) Cake and (Safely) Eat It Too, in Common Lisp
    According to the OP, it's from http://mlton.org/ (see https://coalton-lang.github.io/20211010-introducing-coalton/#acknowledgements ). - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flask and MLton, you can also consider the following products

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Poly/ML - The Poly/ML implementation of Standard ML – full multiprocessor support in the thread library and garbage collector, interactive debugger, fast compiler.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

OCaml - (* Binary tree with leaves carrying an integer.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.