No features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Hurl.dev should be more popular than Flagsmith. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Considering all these points, the team at Flagsmith has developed a feature flag management platform Flagsmith and made it open source. The core functionality is open and you can check out the GitHub repository here. I have utilized and authored several blogs discussing their excellent offerings and strategies. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Flagsmith - Release features with confidence; manage feature flags across web, mobile, and server side applications. Use our hosted API, deploy to your own private cloud, or run on-premise. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Flagsmith is written in Django and is open source as well: https://flagsmith.com. Source: almost 2 years ago
Before we dive in, one important call-out: We provide our feature management product to customers in three ways depending on how they want to have it managed: Fully Managed SaaS API, Fully Managed Private Cloud SaaS API and Self-Hosted. The infrastructure costs that we are sharing is for our customers that leverage our Fully Managed SaaS API offering (try it free: https://flagsmith.com/) which represents a portion... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
On March 15th, Sebastian Rindom, the CEO & Co-founder of Medusa, did an interview with Flagsmith where he talked about how Medusa started, why create a headless commerce solution, why make it open-source, and more. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
- This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
LaunchDarkly - LaunchDarkly is a powerful development tool which allows software developers to roll out updates and new features.
Insomnia REST - The most intuitive cross-platform REST API Client ð´
ConfigCat - ConfigCat is a developer-centric feature flag service with unlimited team size, awesome support, and a reasonable price tag.
Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem
Unleash - Open source Feature toggle/flag service. Helps developers decrease their time-to-market and to increase learning through experimentation.
Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development