Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FitNesse VS WritePHPOnline.Com

Compare FitNesse VS WritePHPOnline.Com and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

WritePHPOnline.Com logo WritePHPOnline.Com

WritePHPOnline.Com is an online site that enables you to write code in PHP and view its output.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • WritePHPOnline.Com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-01

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and WritePHPOnline.Com)

FitNesse

WritePHPOnline.Com

Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100
Automated Testing
30 30%
Automated Testing
70% 70
Online Services
0 0%
Online Services
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and WritePHPOnline.Com. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

WritePHPOnline.Com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WritePHPOnline.Com yet. Tracking of WritePHPOnline.Com recommendations started around Mar 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and WritePHPOnline.Com, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

PHPTester.net - PHPTester.net gives developers and learners the ability to write their PHP code and get the output online.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

PHPCodeChecker - PHPCodeChecker is a best-in-class service that enables developers and PHP programmers to write their code online and analyze it.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Paiza.io - Paiza.io allows you to write and run code in many languages.

Loading...