Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FitNesse VS PHPCodeChecker

Compare FitNesse VS PHPCodeChecker and see what are their differences

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

PHPCodeChecker logo PHPCodeChecker

PHPCodeChecker is a best-in-class service that enables developers and PHP programmers to write their code online and analyze it.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • PHPCodeChecker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and PHPCodeChecker)
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Automated Testing
27 27%
73% 73
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and PHPCodeChecker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

PHPCodeChecker might be a bit more popular than FitNesse. We know about 3 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to FitNesse. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

PHPCodeChecker mentions (3)

  • Difference in "for" statement syntax between PHP 5 / 7 / 8?
    Agreed -- but one of my original observations was how the syntax checker at https://phpcodechecker.com/ did not flag the "illegal" spaces if PHP 5.6 was selected, but did flag them if 7.4 or 8.1 is selected. This prompted my original question whether something changed from v5 to v7 in terms of white-space interpretation. Source: over 1 year ago
  • HERE's a list of free platforms you need for your next project!
    Https://phpcodechecker.com/ // reports errors in your code. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Could y’all help me troubleshoot the missing thing from this file?
    I used this website: https://phpcodechecker.com/. Source: about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and PHPCodeChecker, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

PHPTester.net - PHPTester.net gives developers and learners the ability to write their PHP code and get the output online.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

WritePHPOnline.Com - WritePHPOnline.Com is an online site that enables you to write code in PHP and view its output.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

OnlinePHPFunctions - OnlinePHPFunctions is a powerful online code tester that lets you add PHP source code and view its output on your favorite web browser.