Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

FitNesse VS DSG Designer

Compare FitNesse VS DSG Designer and see what are their differences

Content Guardian AI
The only 8-in-1 AI content detector platform in the world. We integrate with leading AI content detectors to give unparalleled confidence that your content appear to be written by a human. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

DSG Designer logo DSG Designer

Clinical Trial Management
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • DSG Designer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-16

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and DSG Designer)

FitNesse

DSG Designer

Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
Clinical Trial Management System
0 0%
Clinical Trial Management System
100% 100
Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Kids Education
0 0%
Kids Education
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and DSG Designer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

DSG Designer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of DSG Designer yet. Tracking of DSG Designer recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and DSG Designer, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

agClinical - Clinical Trial Management

Loading...