Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FitNesse VS Medidata CTMS

Compare FitNesse VS Medidata CTMS and see what are their differences

Preferred Patron
Preferred Patron is the top Customer Loyalty Software Program for businesses in any industry of any size. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

FitNesse logo FitNesse

FitNesse is a fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework.

Medidata CTMS logo Medidata CTMS

Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.
  • FitNesse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-01
  • Medidata CTMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-30

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FitNesse and Medidata CTMS)

FitNesse

Medidata CTMS

Testing
100 100%
Testing
0% 0
Clinical Trial Management System
0 0%
Clinical Trial Management System
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0
Text Messaging
0 0%
Text Messaging
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FitNesse and Medidata CTMS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FitNesse seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FitNesse mentions (3)

  • Is there a feasible preimage attack for any hash function today?
    (I notified the Martin and the FitNesse user mailing list about this back in 2010. I assume their threat model is that the default hash function is about the same as a closed office door - a request to stay out, or at least knock first - rather than a strong preventative measure.) "Uncle" Bob Martin's "FitNesse", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse and http://fitnesse.org/ , uses its own hash function, at... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Why Gherkin (Cucumber, SpecFlow,…) Always Failed with UI Test Automation?
    Cucumber is not the first failed test framework that uses English-like syntax for automated testing (it may be for other uses, but definitely not real test automation). Do you still remember FitNesse (it was quite big about 10 years ago, an example here)? Now it is hardly mentioned. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 10 Tips On How To Improve UI/UX Design of a Web Application
    In-house testing tools help you to differentiate what people say and what they actually do with a product by testing it. FitNesse and Bugwolf are pretty good at this. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Medidata CTMS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Medidata CTMS yet. Tracking of Medidata CTMS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FitNesse and Medidata CTMS, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

OnCore - OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.

Loading...