Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

fish shell VS Request inspector

Compare fish shell VS Request inspector and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.

Request inspector logo Request inspector

Debug web hooks, http clients
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23
  • Request inspector Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

Request inspector features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Request Inspector is designed to be user-friendly, allowing even those without extensive technical knowledge to easily inspect HTTP requests and responses.
  • Real-Time Inspection
    It provides real-time inspection capabilities, enabling users to monitor and analyze HTTP requests as they happen.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The service supports various protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, making it versatile for different types of applications.
  • Custom Endpoints
    Users can create custom endpoints to inspect requests, which is useful for debugging and monitoring specific interactions.
  • Detailed Request Analytics
    It offers detailed analytics on request data, such as headers, payloads, and response times, providing valuable insights for developers.

Possible disadvantages of Request inspector

  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of Request Inspector has limited functionality and may not meet the needs of users who require more advanced features.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Since the platform inspects and logs HTTP requests, users need to be cautious of sharing sensitive data that could be intercepted.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on an external service for request inspection means potential downtime or service unavailability could impact debugging and monitoring processes.
  • Limited Integration Options
    Compared to some other tools, Request Inspector may have fewer integration options with other platforms and services.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are easy to use, leveraging the full potential of the platform's advanced features may require some learning and adaptation.

fish shell videos

+ Add

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Request inspector videos

No Request inspector videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fish shell and Request inspector)

fish shell

Request inspector

Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
Cryptocurrencies
0% 0
API Tools
0 0%
API Tools
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
Blockchain
0% 0
Developer Tools
64 64%
Developer Tools
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using fish shell and Request inspector. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 134 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Request inspector mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Request inspector yet. Tracking of Request inspector recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fish shell and Request inspector, you can also consider the following products

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Loading...