Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

FireCMS VS Structor

Compare FireCMS VS Structor and see what are their differences

Electe
Discover Electe, our data analytics platform dedicated to SMEs. Don't let your data go unused, take your business into the future! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

FireCMS logo FireCMS

An open source CMS/admin panel based on Firestore

Structor logo Structor

Structor horse page with past performances, results, pedigree, photos and videos. Structor horse rating and status. See who is a fan of Structor.
  • FireCMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01
  • Structor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-23

FireCMS features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    FireCMS offers an intuitive and clean user interface that simplifies content management tasks for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Firebase Integration
    Built natively on Firebase, FireCMS allows seamless integration with Firebase features such as authentication, Firestore, and storage, making it an excellent choice for Firebase-centric applications.
  • Real-Time Capabilities
    FireCMS leverages Firebase's real-time capabilities, ensuring that updates to content are immediately reflected across all users and sessions.
  • Customization and Extensibility
    Developers can customize the platform to suit specific business needs through custom form fields, views, and actions.
  • Open-Source
    Being open-source, FireCMS can be freely modified and tailored to fit specific project requirements, and benefits from community contributions.

Possible disadvantages of FireCMS

  • Firebase Dependency
    FireCMS is deeply integrated with Firebase, which may be a limitation for projects not already using Firebase, or for those looking for database-agnostic solutions.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While customization is a strength, it also presents a learning curve for developers unfamiliar with React or Firebase.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Depending on the usage and growing data within Firestore, scaling might present challenges requiring careful planning and cost management.
  • Limited Feature Set Compared to Enterprise Solutions
    FireCMS might lack some advanced enterprise-level features provided by more mature CMS platforms, such as detailed analytics or workflow automation.

Structor features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

FireCMS videos

No FireCMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Structor videos

+ Add

Transformers Classics Scrapper (TFC Structor) Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FireCMS and Structor)

FireCMS

Structor

Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
Developer Tools
81 81%
Developer Tools
19% 19
React
0 0%
React
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
Web App
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using FireCMS and Structor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare FireCMS and Structor

FireCMS Reviews

  1. Fernando Lopez
    · CTO at medicalmotion GmbH ·
    Best Firebase CMS

    Managed to get a back office tool for our new project in very little time. Ton of integrated fields and easy to extend

    🏁 Competitors: Rowy
    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Great ux|Firebase as a backend|Highly customizable|Free for commercial use
    👎 Cons:    Requires some development knowledge

Structor Reviews

We have no reviews of Structor yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FireCMS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 16 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FireCMS mentions (16)

  • FireCMS Flavours in the CLI
    That's it! You are ready to go. You can now start building your project with FireCMS. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Firebase: The Ultimate Backend for Your CMS
    In the rapidly evolving landscape of content management systems (CMS), choosing the right backend is more critical than ever. Developers are faced with a plethora of options, from traditional setups like WordPress to modern headless CMSs like Strapi, Contentful, and Sanity. At FireCMS, we've embraced Firebase as the backbone of our CMS, and in this article, we'll delve into the benefits of using Firebase over... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Fire CMS, CMS based on Firebase 🚀
    FireCMS is a free, open-source headless CMS based on Firebase, that both developers and content manager will love 🚀 #firebase #cms #content. Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's the best CMS to start with if you're already a programmer?
    Been looking into fireCms.co an extendable gui for interacting with firebase Firestone and storage . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Any suggestions for an off-the-self UI for firestore.
    I like FireCMS. It requires a little bit of customization but it's very flexible. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Structor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Structor yet. Tracking of Structor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FireCMS and Structor, you can also consider the following products

Blur Admin - Angular admin panel front-end framework

Laravel Nova - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and MVC Tools

Tabler - Admin panel made simple

Laravel Breeze - Breeze provides a minimal and simple starting point for building a Laravel application with authentication.

Forest Admin - Execute fast and at scale with no time wasted on internal tools developed in-house.

Laravel Voyager - The missing Laravel admin

Loading...