The way to value stocks is by running a DCF analysis. There's software that can do that for you, for example at: finbox.com. In a DCF analysis you have to come up with some estimates with regards to future revenue, capex, depreciation, EBITDA margins, and other things like that. Then, based on these estimates and your desired rate of return, the DCF model should tell you how much the company is worth today. Source: over 2 years ago

The bond market is twice the size of the equity market, but it's more opaque. I'm looking for some kind of dashboard, like Wallmine, Finbox, Trading Economics, or Messari, for real-time capital flows through Treasurys, bonds, credit markets, and the like. Any good resources out there? Also, anything good on private markets as well (VC, PE, etc.)? Source: about 3 years ago

I know finbox.com got this $10k grant but never did YC itself. Source: over 3 years ago

How good is finbox.com? The models you can choose from are already filled up. Is that data I can rely on? Source: about 4 years ago

I made this data visualisation in Adobe After Effects. I download the stock information from Finbox (https://finbox.com) and created json file with it. I linked this data file to the animation using Javascript. Source: over 4 years ago

So, I tested as far back as the portfoliovisualizer.com would let me the various equivalents that u/apollosmith lists and it *seems* that Schwab's offerings:. Source: over 1 year ago

I'm choosing a strategy for long-term investment. There are discussions about Five-Factor and Four Found Combo(and a 10-part portfolio). But I can't find any posts/threads comparing them. Which one is better? I used the portfoliovisualizer.com tool to analyze the portfolios. The results are very close. I can't decide which one to choose. Any advice/thoughts are appreciated. Source: almost 2 years ago

Lately I've been playing around a lot with the Monte Carlo simulation tool over at portfoliovisualizer.com to stress test my FIRE plans against different asset allocations. I've noticed that the Perpetual Withdrawal Rate sometimes ends up being a higher % than the Safe Withdrawal Rate in the performance summary section that shows the outcomes for different percentiles. This just doesn't make sense to my brain if,... Source: almost 2 years ago

I didn't have a thought process: I ran Portfolio Visualizer on the combination. The 60/40 blend is better than 50/50 and better than either one alone--they beat the so-called benchmark. Check out https://portfoliovisualizer.com with different values. You can try substituting SCHG for VO. Remember that this is backtesting and that no one can tell the future. Source: almost 2 years ago

Ah, ok. So you need it to also do a comparison, or side-by-side of current vs. proposed. If I need to show a visual comparing two portfolios for any reason, I use portfoliovisualizer.com. We don't use it much for proposal purposes, but we do use it to review our models, etc. It can genereate decent looking PDFs. Source: about 2 years ago