FileZilla Server VS the xonsh shell

I hate bundled adware as much as the next man here, but we also need to be fair and acknowledge that FileZilla plainly informs the user: "This installer may include bundled offers. Check below for more options." The download page[1] that is referred to be "check below" then gives a list of both installers (without the adware) and ZIP archives, and notably does not list the adware'd installer. [1]:... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

If you click the "quick download link" on the home page it will lead you to downloading a "sponsored" version of the application, e.g. "FileZilla_3.66.5_win64_sponsored2-setup.exe" for me on Windows. Clicking "show additional download options" takes you to https://filezilla-project.org/download.php?show_all=1 which has links to "clean" versions of the client. Sidenote: It was Windows Defender which pointed out to... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

A very common client used for FTP transfers from a computer is FileZilla. Source: over 1 year ago

In order to do this, you need to runIDC version of the exploit (to allow full FTP access). Once you send the payload (assuming you know how to FTP already) ftp to your PS4 with FileZilla or whatever using port 1337. Source: almost 2 years ago

Step 1: Make sure you have the PS4 Save Mounter downloaded (and make sure it is 1.8) as well as an FTP program (such as FileZilla or WinSCP). Source: over 2 years ago

Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly. However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Sorry for the hijack, but I've been using xonsh[1] since 2018. It's a shell with Python syntax. If you dislike Bash scripting, and know Python, please consider this! [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience? It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands. I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh? https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Not to hijack, but also consider xonsh[1]. It's Python based, and all your scripts can be Python (or hybrid-Python). I've been using it for both Windows and Linux for over 5 years. [1] https://xon.sh/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago