Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

File Commander – File Manager/Explorer VS Azure File Storage

Compare File Commander – File Manager/Explorer VS Azure File Storage and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

File Commander – File Manager/Explorer logo File Commander – File Manager/Explorer

File Commander – File Manager/Explorer is a world’s leading and powerful file manager that lets you handle any file on your Android device, cloud storage or network location via the clean and intuitive interface.

Azure File Storage logo Azure File Storage

Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.
  • File Commander – File Manager/Explorer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-27
  • Azure File Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

File Commander – File Manager/Explorer features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    File Commander offers an intuitive and organized interface, making it easy for users to navigate and manage their files efficiently.
  • Versatile File Management
    The app supports a wide range of file formats and provides powerful tools for file browsing, transferring, compressing, and extracting.
  • Cloud Storage Integration
    File Commander integrates seamlessly with various cloud storage services, allowing users to access and manage their files across different platforms.
  • Security Features
    The app includes security options like file encryption and a secure mode to protect sensitive information.
  • Built-in Media Player and Viewer
    It comes with built-in media players and viewers for photos, videos, and documents, streamlining the process of opening and viewing different file types.

Possible disadvantages of File Commander – File Manager/Explorer

  • Advertisements
    The free version of File Commander includes ads, which can disrupt the user experience and be intrusive.
  • Premium Features
    Some advanced features are locked behind a paywall, requiring users to purchase a premium version for full functionality.
  • Performance Issues on Older Devices
    Users with older or less powerful devices may experience slower performance or app crashes, particularly when handling large files.
  • Limited Customer Support
    Some users report limited customer support options, making it challenging to resolve issues or seek assistance.

Azure File Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure File Storage can seamlessly scale up to support your data storage needs without sacrificing performance, ensuring that businesses can grow without concerns about storage limitations.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Azure takes care of the maintenance, updates, and infrastructure, reducing administrative overhead for IT teams, and allowing them to focus on other business-critical tasks.
  • Integration
    Azure File Storage integrates well with other Microsoft products such as Windows Server and other Azure services, enabling a cohesive and efficient ecosystem for consistent and smooth user experiences.
  • Access Control
    Provides robust access control through Azure Active Directory, setting up specific permissions, ensuring that data remains secure and only accessible to authorized users.
  • Cross-platform Access
    Supports the SMB protocol, allowing access from various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, enabling diverse environments to interact seamlessly with the storage service.

Possible disadvantages of Azure File Storage

  • Cost
    Costs can accumulate rapidly, especially in scenarios involving large volumes of data, frequent access, or high redundancy, potentially leading to substantial operational expenses.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    The pricing model can be complex with various tiers and charges based on operations, data redundancy, and outbound data transfer, making it difficult to predict the exact costs effectively.
  • Latency
    While generally fast, there can be latency issues, particularly in situations where files are accessed from regions that are geographically distant from the storage location, affecting performance.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to on-premise solutions, there is limited capacity for customization of the infrastructure and may not meet specific needs of certain businesses that require tailor-made setups.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Azure File Storage relies on stable internet connectivity, which can be a risk for businesses situated in areas with unstable networks or outages, impacting the ability to access data.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to File Commander – File Manager/Explorer and Azure File Storage)
File Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using File Commander – File Manager/Explorer and Azure File Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure File Storage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

File Commander – File Manager/Explorer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of File Commander – File Manager/Explorer yet. Tracking of File Commander – File Manager/Explorer recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure File Storage mentions (14)

  • A Step by Step Guide on How to Migrate from AWS to Azure
    If your workloads require shared storage, Azure Files is a nice pick. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Searching for online alternative for a synology
    Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How To Upload and Delete files in Azure Blob Storage Using Blazor Apps With .NET 7
    ​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Hosted, mappable storage?
    If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Microsoft cloud drive options
    I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing File Commander – File Manager/Explorer and Azure File Storage, you can also consider the following products

Cx File Explorer - Cx File Explorer is a free powerful file manager application with a clean and intuitive interface.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

Moto File Manager - Moto File Manager is an Android application that allows you to manage your files efficiently and easily.

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Solid Explorer - Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.

Google Cloud Resource Manager - Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.