Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Resource Manager VS Azure File Storage

Compare Google Cloud Resource Manager VS Azure File Storage and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Resource Manager logo Google Cloud Resource Manager

Resource Manager provides methods that you can use to programmatically manage your projects on Google Cloud Platform.

Azure File Storage logo Azure File Storage

Try Azure File Storage for managed file shares that use standard SMB 3.0 protocol. Share data with on-premises and cloud servers, integrate with apps, and more.
  • Google Cloud Resource Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Azure File Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

Google Cloud Resource Manager features and specs

  • Hierarchical Management
    Allows users to manage resources in a hierarchical structure, such as organizations, folders, and projects, for improved organization and control.
  • Access Control
    Provides fine-grained access control through Identity and Access Management (IAM), enabling users to set precise permissions across resources.
  • Resource Organization
    Facilitates resource organization and grouping, making it easier to understand and manage infrastructure across multiple projects and environments.
  • Audit Logs
    Enables auditing and monitoring of resource changes, which is crucial for compliance and security purposes.
  • Automation
    Supports automation through APIs and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) tools, enhancing efficiency and reducing manual overhead.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Resource Manager

  • Complexity
    The hierarchical management and access control features can add complexity, requiring a learning curve for effective use.
  • Dependency on IAM
    Heavily reliant on IAM for access management, which, if not configured correctly, can lead to security vulnerabilities or access issues.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of the resource hierarchy can be time-consuming, especially for organizations with large-scale deployments.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Certain features or capabilities might be limited based on the specific Google Cloud region, affecting the global consistency of deployments.
  • Cost Implications
    While the tool itself isn't charged, mismanagement and inefficient resource organization can lead to increased costs elsewhere in the Google Cloud ecosystem.

Azure File Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure File Storage can seamlessly scale up to support your data storage needs without sacrificing performance, ensuring that businesses can grow without concerns about storage limitations.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed service, Azure takes care of the maintenance, updates, and infrastructure, reducing administrative overhead for IT teams, and allowing them to focus on other business-critical tasks.
  • Integration
    Azure File Storage integrates well with other Microsoft products such as Windows Server and other Azure services, enabling a cohesive and efficient ecosystem for consistent and smooth user experiences.
  • Access Control
    Provides robust access control through Azure Active Directory, setting up specific permissions, ensuring that data remains secure and only accessible to authorized users.
  • Cross-platform Access
    Supports the SMB protocol, allowing access from various operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, enabling diverse environments to interact seamlessly with the storage service.

Possible disadvantages of Azure File Storage

  • Cost
    Costs can accumulate rapidly, especially in scenarios involving large volumes of data, frequent access, or high redundancy, potentially leading to substantial operational expenses.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    The pricing model can be complex with various tiers and charges based on operations, data redundancy, and outbound data transfer, making it difficult to predict the exact costs effectively.
  • Latency
    While generally fast, there can be latency issues, particularly in situations where files are accessed from regions that are geographically distant from the storage location, affecting performance.
  • Limited Customization
    Compared to on-premise solutions, there is limited capacity for customization of the infrastructure and may not meet specific needs of certain businesses that require tailor-made setups.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Azure File Storage relies on stable internet connectivity, which can be a risk for businesses situated in areas with unstable networks or outages, impacting the ability to access data.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Resource Manager and Azure File Storage)
Cloud Storage
43 43%
57% 57
Project Management
44 44%
56% 56
Work Collaboration
43 43%
57% 57
Online Services
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Resource Manager and Azure File Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure File Storage seems to be a lot more popular than Google Cloud Resource Manager. While we know about 14 links to Azure File Storage, we've tracked only 1 mention of Google Cloud Resource Manager. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Resource Manager mentions (1)

  • Google Cloud Reference
    Cloud Resource Manager: Cloud project metadata management 🔗Link 🔗Link. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Azure File Storage mentions (14)

  • A Step by Step Guide on How to Migrate from AWS to Azure
    If your workloads require shared storage, Azure Files is a nice pick. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Searching for online alternative for a synology
    Azure Files perhaps? Or if you need frequently accessed files to be quicker then Azure File Sync. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How To Upload and Delete files in Azure Blob Storage Using Blazor Apps With .NET 7
    ​To know more details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/files/. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Hosted, mappable storage?
    If you have a use case that affords any kind of budget, maybe consder Azure Files. It is an SMB share you access over the internet. Basically, windows file server but hardened and entirely managed by Microsoft. This is as hands-off as it gets for an SMB share. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Microsoft cloud drive options
    I have a client that (finally!) decided to go all-in on Azure; I had prepared the owner to expect additional costs based on their need for a file share -- I was expecting to have to use Azure Files. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Resource Manager and Azure File Storage, you can also consider the following products

Google Cloud Filestore - Fully-managed cloud file storage

Cyberduck - A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Igloo Software - Igloo is a modern intranet, it connects people with the information they need to do their best work.

IBM Cloud File Storage - IBM Cloud File Storage is flash-backed, durable, fast, and flexible NFS-based file storage.

HPE Nimble Storage - Hit the app-data gap? HPE Nimble Storage flash arrays and solutions with predictive analytics ensure fast, reliable access to data for data center and cloud applications.

Zadara Storage - Enterprise Storage-as-a-Service Solutions (STaaS). On premises or in the cloud. Fully-managed 24/7. Pay only for what you use. Leading companies worldwide trust Zadara Data Storage. Proud to be the best cloud storage option