figshare VS MIT License

-Crystal growing information Http://xrayweb.chem.ou.edu/notes/xtalgrow.html Https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/education/2538901/Tips\_and\_Tricks\_for\_the\_Lab\_Growing\_Crystals\_Part\_2.html Free science Figures Https://smart.servier.com/ Https://phil.cdc.gov/ Databases of molecules and data Https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/ - database of bioactive molecules with drug-like... Source: over 2 years ago

I am a PhD student and conducting a clinical trial in eczema. I have used figshare.com to make my work public, which is used by many universities and academics to disseminate their work for free! No doubt that publishing in journals is the best way to reach your target audience, however there might be cost implications. Source: over 2 years ago

Question: Why do you choose LGPL-3.0? For many, of the most attractive features of SQLite is its license (or should I say lack thereof). I realise some people view public domain as legally problematic. I think the best answer for that is public-domain equivalent licenses such as 0BSD [0] or MIT-0 [1] – technically still copyrighted, but effectively not. (There are other, possibly more well-known options such as... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

There's also another OSI approved "zero" license called MIT-0 https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Probably a MIT-0 header will make people less worried to use the code. Take a look at https://opensource.org/license/mit-0/ https://github.com/aws/mit-0. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

There's even a variant of the license called 'MIT No Attribution License' that has this specific clause removed (just in case you aren't convinced that the clause does cover attribution): https://github.com/aws/mit-0. Source: 11 months ago