Fig VS Kitty terminal

Compare Fig VS Kitty terminal and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Fig

Fast, isolated development environments using Docker.

Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

Landing page //
2023-05-08

Landing page //
2023-06-21

Are Figs Scrubs Worth it?! | HONEST Review!

Kitty terminal videos

+ Add

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fig and Kitty terminal)

Kitty terminal

Developer Tools

100 100%

Developer Tools

0% 0

SSH

0 0%

SSH

100% 100

Productivity

100 100%

Productivity

0% 0

Terminal Tools

14 14%

Terminal Tools

86% 86

User comments

Share your experience with using Fig and Kitty terminal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitty terminal seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 88 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fig mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fig yet. Tracking of Fig recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Kitty terminal mentions (88)

Warp, the modern terminal, is now available for Linux
A terminal with built-in telemetry and a pricing model... Just what I never wanted! To avoid being too negative, I'll offer the option of Kitty[1]. My current favorite terminal. Supports many features. Including my personal favorites: * ctrl+c (as opposed to stupid things like ctrl+shift+c) to copy data only when you have content selected. Otherwise, ctrl+c sends a sigint like normal. * font ligature support (a... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I Just Wanted Emacs to Look Nice – Using 24-Bit Color in Terminals
IME, this is like the golden age of terminal apps in general and macOS-compatible ones in particular. There are several really good terminals for macOS: [iTerm2 app](https://iterm2.com/) [Kitty terminal](https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) [WezTerm terminal](https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/index.html) [Alacritty](https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty) -... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Waveterm
I haven’t tried this yet (so please take my commentary with a grain of salt), but my initial thoughts are: (1) it looks interesting, (2) it looks overwhelming (there’s a lot going on in those screenshots), and (3) it’s likely slow (I might be completely wrong). To elaborate a bit… 1. I love good design work and well-designed (UI-wise) software, and it certainly looks like the creators of Wave Terminal have made... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Contour: Modern and Fast Terminal Emulator
There are lots of terminal projects recently. Ghostty (https://mitchellh.com/ghostty) and Terminal Click (https://terminal.click) come to mind. Also Warp and Fig but they don't appeal to me because they're proprietary (and Fig got acquired by Amazon). I've been very happy with kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) for years and it would take a lot to make me switch. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Linux Terminal Emulators Have the Potential of Being Much Faster
I favor kitty[0] and zutty[1]. Gnome terminal / libvte is and has always been slow, and alacritty might have good throughput, but sadly is high latency. 0. https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ 1. https://tomscii.sig7.se/zutty/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago