FeedbacQ VS Condens.io

FeedbacQ

Real-time customer feedback and survey management solution.

Condens.io

Make storing, analyzing and sharing all UX research data easier, faster and more enjoyable.

Landing page //
2021-10-12

Landing page //
2020-04-23

Analyze qualitative data from user research

Note taking and Ai-assisted tagging
Automated transcription and video editing
Digital whiteboard with affinity clusters, journey maps and more

Share findings online

Viewers don't need a Condens account to see findings
Hide participant information for data privacy
Use short clips and highlight reels as evidence

Build a UX research repository

All research insights in one place
Separate interface for colleagues to find existing research
Full control which data is shared with colleagues

FeedbacQ

Website: feedbacq.co
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -
Platforms: -
Release Date: -
Categories: #Forms And Surveys #Surveys #Customer Feedback #OMR

Edit details

Condens.io

Website: condens.io
Pricing URL: Official Condens.io Pricing
$ Details: paid Free Trial $15.0 / Monthly
Platforms: Browser Web
Release Date: 2019 June
Categories: #UX #User Experience #UX Research #Usability Testing

Edit details

FeedbacQ features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Condens.io features and specs

AI-assisted tagging: Tag notes from user research quickly
Media highlights: Create clips from audio and video recordings
Affinity clustering: Cluster related evidence to come up with findings
Sharing: Make UX research findings accessible online
UX research repository: Store past research in a structured manner to find it again easily

FeedbacQ videos

+ Add

FeedbacQ - Intercom Integration For Messenger Surveys

Condens.io videos

+ Add

Condens.io Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FeedbacQ and Condens.io)

Condens.io

Forms And Surveys

100 100%

Forms And Surveys

0% 0

User Experience

0 0%

User Experience

100% 100

Customer Feedback

100 100%

Customer Feedback

0% 0

UX

0 0%

UX

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FeedbacQ and Condens.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Condens.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FeedbacQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of FeedbacQ yet. Tracking of FeedbacQ recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Condens.io mentions (3)

Research Repositories - what are you using?
Https://dovetailapp.com/ and https://condens.io/ (both excellent and specifically focused on user research). Source: almost 2 years ago
Research repository tips
Other options include EnjoyHQ, Aurelius, and Condens. Out of those 3, I tried Condens last year and gave up on it, because the transcription quality was sub-par. When we were considering which tool to use earlier this year, the video montage option and the ability to do the analysis fully from the tool swayed us, and we ended up picking Dovetail. So it really depends on what you want the repository to do, support... Source: over 2 years ago
Tools to automate analysis of interview notes?
Look at Condens. We demo’d it last year. I like it a lot as a tool to aid in synthesis. Didn’t end up going with it because it didn’t meet all of our requirements as a team, but I was still very impressed. Source: about 3 years ago