Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

fd VS ShellHistory

Compare fd VS ShellHistory and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

fd logo fd

A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

ShellHistory logo ShellHistory

Full-Text Search, backup, synchronize and organize your shell history
  • fd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18
  • ShellHistory Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-19

fd features and specs

  • Speed
    fd is optimized for speed and can outperform traditional tools like find due to its use of parallelism and optimized algorithms.
  • Ease of Use
    fd has a simpler and more user-friendly syntax compared to find, making it easier to learn and use.
  • Colorized Output
    fd provides colorized output by default, making it easier to differentiate between file types and enhancing readability.
  • Smart Case
    fd enables smart case detection by default, meaning searches are case-insensitive unless the pattern includes an uppercase letter.
  • Defaults to Ignoring Hidden Files
    By default, fd ignores hidden files and directories, as well as files specified in .gitignore, helping to narrow down search results to relevant files.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    fd supports multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of fd

  • Dependency on Rust
    fd requires the Rust toolchain to build, which may be inconvenient for environments where installing additional dependencies is restricted.
  • Limited to Modern Features
    fd may not support some legacy systems and older versions of operating systems, limiting its applicability in certain scenarios.
  • Not as Feature-Rich
    While fd is easier to use, it doesn't have all the advanced features and fine-grained control options that find offers.
  • Compatibility
    fd’s simplified syntax and modern features may not be directly compatible with scripts or workflows that depend on find, requiring adjustments for integration.

ShellHistory features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of fd

Overall verdict

  • Yes, fd (github.com) is generally considered good, particularly for its speed, ease of use, and modern features that enhance productivity over the traditional 'find' command.

Why this product is good

  • fd is a program for users who need a fast and user-friendly alternative to the traditional 'find' command. It provides a simple syntax, speed improvements by parallelizing search processes, ignores hidden files and directories by default, and offers colorized outputs, making it more intuitive and efficient for everyday use.

Recommended for

    fd is recommended for developers, system administrators, and power users who often search through directories and require a fast, efficient tool with a shorter learning curve.

fd videos

Discmania FD (Fairway Driver) Golf Disc Review

More videos:

  • Review - Honda Civic FD | Review & Tips If you want to own one
  • Review - Regular Car Reviews: 1993 Mazda RX-7 FD

ShellHistory videos

No ShellHistory videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fd and ShellHistory)
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tool
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
REST API
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fd and ShellHistory. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fd seems to be a lot more popular than ShellHistory. While we know about 126 links to fd, we've tracked only 9 mentions of ShellHistory. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fd mentions (126)

View more

ShellHistory mentions (9)

  • SQLite FTS5 Extension
    I use it in one of my macOS apps (ShellHistory) for storing and searching history from shell (zsh, bash, fish). Works very well. https://loshadki.app/shellhistory/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • I quit my job to work full time on my open source project [Atuin]
    I keep my shell history in sqlite database since 2017. Around 120k records at this point. Never synced history from the work laptops. Only personal history. In 2017 wrote my own bash script (later optimized for zsh) to just record everything in sqlite with hooks on prompt. [1] I mostly work right now on Mac, don't need to support Linux anymore, so wrote an app for Mac, that syncs the history over iCloud, and has a... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Atuin replaces your existing shell history with a SQLite database
    - [2] https://loshadki.app/shellhistory/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Show HN: HiSHtory: Your shell history in context, synced, and queryable
    There's an app for Macs with iCloud sync as well: https://loshadki.app/shellhistory/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • ShellHistory v2 - Beta
    Oops, updated, this is the link https://loshadki.app/shellhistory/. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fd and ShellHistory, you can also consider the following products

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

Rester's Dummy Run - Deploy Rest APIs in one click

Bat - A cat(1) clone with wings.

Jobs for Developers - Find new development opportunities and get hired by amazing companies

The Silver Searcher - A code searching tool similar to ack, with a focus on speed.

Diagram - Nocode API builder - A nocode Tool to build complex API endpoints with simple drag and drop blocks