FactCheck VS Generated.photos

Sute, it has all been 'debunked', presumably by your favourite website, factcheck.org, brought to you by the Annenberg Foundation. RWJF and Facebook. Source: 10 months ago

This is very very simple. The answer is yes. You're so naive you believe factcheck.org. Source: 11 months ago

I presented you the facts. He was listed as an owner and shareholder still as of time it was fact checked by factcheck.org in both the USA and China. Source: 11 months ago

Since you get your news from bombastic headlines, let's educate you with data from factcheck.org, again, not conservative leaning at all (it's run by RAND corp, and has a "Lean Left" rating from Allsides Media Bias Rating. Factcheck says, "There also was no part of the state’s lawsuit that dealt with allegations that the Trump Foundation “stole from a kids cancer charity,” as the posts claim. That detail appears... Source: 12 months ago

Factcheck.org is a 'leftist' source? What does that mean to you? What is leftist about the facts portrayed? Or is it that you can't comprehend the facts that makes it leftist? Source: about 1 year ago

Yes I could use generator like generated.photos but it gives you a single plain image, which is not enough to perform well. Source: 12 months ago

Credit to generated.photos for the AI generated face. Source: about 1 year ago

When you reverse image search the photos they all come back as coming from the site generated.photos. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://generated.photos AI generated photos. Source: about 1 year ago

You can use "generated.photos" to create faces of black people but, recently it's now a paid service :\. Source: over 1 year ago