Generated.photos VS This Person Does Not Exist

Yes I could use generator like generated.photos but it gives you a single plain image, which is not enough to perform well. Source: 12 months ago

Credit to generated.photos for the AI generated face. Source: 12 months ago

When you reverse image search the photos they all come back as coming from the site generated.photos. Source: about 1 year ago

Https://generated.photos AI generated photos. Source: about 1 year ago

You can use "generated.photos" to create faces of black people but, recently it's now a paid service :\. Source: over 1 year ago

I'm sure there will be plenty of new individual writers for you to follow, like this one [0], or this one [1], or this one [2]. 0: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ 1: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ 2: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

I wonder if we will ever get a realism model which can produce normal faces like https://thispersondoesnotexist.com instead of like super symmetrical faces of models. Source: 5 months ago

This has been in circulation since a while AI images took off, and they certainly weren't convincing before they did. You know the old "try to name one thing in this image" macro? Pretty sure that was AI generated, there was also thispersondoesnotexist.com which was always pretty good but of course it is. Source: 5 months ago

Not the workflow for these images, but if you easily want to spice up your gens with a bit more natural look, try using images from thispersondoesnotexist.com with IPAdapter face model. Source: 5 months ago

...then they just use the app on generated images of not real people (potentially based on specific inputs to remind you of a real person). Source: 5 months ago