Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

F# VS Common Lisp

Compare F# VS Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

F# logo F#

F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

Common Lisp logo Common Lisp

The modern, multi-paradigm, high-performance, compiled, ANSI-standardized descendant of the long-running family of Lisp programming languages
  • F# Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.

  • Common Lisp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

We recommend LibHunt Common Lisp for discovery and comparisons of trending Common Lisp projects.

F# features and specs

  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    F# primarily supports functional programming, which promotes immutability and first-class functions, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.
  • Interoperability
    F# provides seamless interoperability with .NET libraries and languages like C#, allowing developers to leverage a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries.
  • Conciseness
    F# code tends to be concise and expressive, reducing boilerplate code and enhancing readability.
  • Type Inference
    Powerful type inference capabilities reduce the need for explicit type annotations, making the code easier to write and refactor.
  • Asynchronous Programming
    F# provides robust support for asynchronous programming, enabling the creation of responsive applications and efficient I/O handling.
  • Community and Resources
    An active community and wealth of online resources provide support and facilitate learning through forums, tutorials, and documentation.
  • Multi-Paradigm
    Despite its functional core, F# also supports imperative and object-oriented programming, offering flexibility to developers.

Possible disadvantages of F#

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from imperative or object-oriented backgrounds, the functional programming paradigm in F# can present a steep learning curve.
  • IDE and Tooling
    Although F# is integrated into Visual Studio, the overall tooling and IDE support for F# is not as mature as for more established languages like C#.
  • Market Demand
    The demand for F# skillsets in the job market is comparatively lower than for more mainstream languages, potentially affecting career opportunities.
  • Performance Overhead
    While generally efficient, certain operations in F# may incur performance overhead due to the functional aspects and abstractions, especially when not optimized.
  • Library Support
    Although F# can access the .NET library ecosystem, it has a relatively smaller number of libraries and frameworks specifically designed for it compared to languages like Python or JavaScript.
  • Niche Language
    F# is often considered a niche language, which can lead to a smaller community and fewer resources compared to more popular languages.

Common Lisp features and specs

  • Powerful Macro System
    Common Lisp offers a robust macro system that allows for metaprogramming, letting developers easily extend the language and create domain-specific languages.
  • Dynamic Typing
    Common Lisp supports dynamic typing, which allows for more flexibility in coding and prototyping, reducing the amount of boilerplate code needed.
  • Interactive Development Environment
    It provides a powerful REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) that aids in interactive and iterative software development, enabling quick testing and debugging.
  • Portability
    Code written in Common Lisp can be run on different platforms without modification, thanks to its standardized specification and portability across implementations.
  • Rich Standard Library
    Common Lisp comes with a comprehensive standard library that includes a wide range of utilities for data manipulation, I/O operations, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Common Lisp

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The language has an extensive set of features and a unique syntax, which can be difficult for beginners to learn and master.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more modern languages, Common Lisp has a smaller ecosystem of libraries and community support, which can hinder development speed and resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Performance can vary significantly between different implementations of Common Lisp due to variations in optimizing compilers and runtime environments.
  • Obscure Syntax
    The syntax can be difficult to read and understand, especially for those coming from more conventional languages like Python or JavaScript.
  • Commercial Use Challenges
    Common Lisp's licensing and support can be less favorable for commercial use compared to other mainstream programming languages.

F# videos

+ Add

F# Software Foundation Year in Review

More videos:

  • Review - F# Blues Harp Review
  • Review - F# base Bhavika flute review by Dhyey patel ji

Common Lisp videos

+ Add

Common Lisp Study Group - A In-depth Look into CLOS (part 1)

More videos:

  • Review - Common Lisp Study Group - Closures and Macro Basics

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to F# and Common Lisp)

F#

Common Lisp

Programming Language
58 58%
Programming Language
42% 42
OOP
59 59%
OOP
41% 41
Generic Programming Language
62 62%
Generic Programming Language
38% 38
Development
53 53%
Development
47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using F# and Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, F# should be more popular than Common Lisp. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

F# mentions (21)

  • What's New in F# 9
    It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Rust panics under the hood, and implementing them in .NET
    Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all predate the MIT licensed .net, but prior to that there was mono, which was also MIT licensed. 1: https://dotlisp.sourceforge.net/dotlisp.htm 2: https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Roc – A fast, friendly, functional language
    Oh yeah. A key hindrance of F# is that MS treats it like a side project even though it's probably their secret weapon, and a lot of the adopters are dotnet coders who already know the basics so the on-boarding is less than ideal. https://fsharp.org/ is the best place to actually start. https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ is the standard recommendation from there but there's finally some good youtube and other... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
    Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I am a ChatGPT bot - Ask me anything #2
    Are you really a bot? Yes, I'm a small F# program that glues together the public API's provided by Reddit and OpenAI. I was created by /u/brianberns. You can find my source code here. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Common Lisp mentions (11)

  • Origins of the Lisp logo
    The yin-yang logo with lambdas was designed by Guy Steele, and he has granted permission for its use to Common Lisp Foundation (the entity which runs common-lisp.net website and the gitlab.common-lisp.net repo). Source: about 2 years ago
  • New open source Common Lisp 3D graphics project -- call for participation
    A wiki and pm tool I personally like a lot, simple, lightweight, is trac but there is no free hosting available — but I could work on hosting on AWS for instance. MoinMoin is also a good and simple wiki. You are using Medium a lot, which could also be a sensible option but it is more a publishing platform than a collaborative platform. Gitlab is also a popular choice I believe and we could use the instance on... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • common-lisp.net down
    Does anybody have information how the content on common-lisp.net is handled? Source: about 3 years ago
  • common-lisp.net down
    Any insight into the current down-time for common-lisp.net? Source: about 3 years ago
  • What should be my next programming language?
    Python seems like a popular option these days and it is different enough from C++ in that it may teach you to think about programming in a different way. You could also try a functional language such as Lisp, Scheme) or Haskell -- they too will make you think differently about programming. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing F# and Common Lisp, you can also consider the following products

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

D (Programming Language) - D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.

Go Programming Language - Go, also called golang, is a programming language initially developed at Google in 2007 by Robert...

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Loading...