Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

F# VS ClojureScript

Compare F# VS ClojureScript and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

F# logo F#

F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

ClojureScript logo ClojureScript

A Clojure compiler targeting JavaScript
  • F# Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.

  • ClojureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06

F# features and specs

  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    F# primarily supports functional programming, which promotes immutability and first-class functions, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.
  • Interoperability
    F# provides seamless interoperability with .NET libraries and languages like C#, allowing developers to leverage a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries.
  • Conciseness
    F# code tends to be concise and expressive, reducing boilerplate code and enhancing readability.
  • Type Inference
    Powerful type inference capabilities reduce the need for explicit type annotations, making the code easier to write and refactor.
  • Asynchronous Programming
    F# provides robust support for asynchronous programming, enabling the creation of responsive applications and efficient I/O handling.
  • Community and Resources
    An active community and wealth of online resources provide support and facilitate learning through forums, tutorials, and documentation.
  • Multi-Paradigm
    Despite its functional core, F# also supports imperative and object-oriented programming, offering flexibility to developers.

Possible disadvantages of F#

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from imperative or object-oriented backgrounds, the functional programming paradigm in F# can present a steep learning curve.
  • IDE and Tooling
    Although F# is integrated into Visual Studio, the overall tooling and IDE support for F# is not as mature as for more established languages like C#.
  • Market Demand
    The demand for F# skillsets in the job market is comparatively lower than for more mainstream languages, potentially affecting career opportunities.
  • Performance Overhead
    While generally efficient, certain operations in F# may incur performance overhead due to the functional aspects and abstractions, especially when not optimized.
  • Library Support
    Although F# can access the .NET library ecosystem, it has a relatively smaller number of libraries and frameworks specifically designed for it compared to languages like Python or JavaScript.
  • Niche Language
    F# is often considered a niche language, which can lead to a smaller community and fewer resources compared to more popular languages.

ClojureScript features and specs

  • Immutable Data Structures
    ClojureScript provides persistent, immutable data structures which simplify reasoning about code and avoiding unintended side effects.
  • Functional Programming
    ClojureScript is a Lisp that encourages functional programming, aiding the creation of concise and predictable code.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    ClojureScript can interoperate seamlessly with JavaScript, allowing access to JavaScript libraries and facilitating interaction with existing JavaScript codebases.
  • REPL Driven Development
    The REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) in ClojureScript enables rapid testing and iteration of code, resulting in more efficient development processes.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    ClojureScript benefits from the rich ecosystem of Clojure libraries and tools, as well as those available in the JavaScript ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of ClojureScript

  • Learning Curve
    ClojureScript has a steep learning curve for developers new to Lisp or functional programming paradigms, which may limit its initial adoption.
  • Compilation Overhead
    Unlike JavaScript, ClojureScript code needs to be compiled, which can add complexity and overhead to the development workflow.
  • Smaller Community
    ClojureScript has a smaller community compared to more mainstream JavaScript frameworks, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Tooling Complexity
    Integrating ClojureScript into existing projects can be complex, and its tooling setup might not be as straightforward as more established JavaScript tools.
  • Performance
    While generally performant, ClojureScript applications can sometimes face performance penalties due to the abstraction layers involved.

F# videos

F# Software Foundation Year in Review

More videos:

  • Review - F# Blues Harp Review
  • Review - F# base Bhavika flute review by Dhyey patel ji

ClojureScript videos

How to use NPM Packages in ClojureScript

More videos:

  • Review - ClojureScript - Chris Houser
  • Review - ClojureScript Release - Rich Hickey

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to F# and ClojureScript)
Programming Language
100 100%
0% 0
Personal Finance
0 0%
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
Financial Planner
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using F# and ClojureScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

F# might be a bit more popular than ClojureScript. We know about 21 links to it since March 2021 and only 17 links to ClojureScript. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

F# mentions (21)

  • What's New in F# 9
    It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Rust panics under the hood, and implementing them in .NET
    Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all predate the MIT licensed .net, but prior to that there was mono, which was also MIT licensed. 1: https://dotlisp.sourceforge.net/dotlisp.htm 2: https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Roc – A fast, friendly, functional language
    Oh yeah. A key hindrance of F# is that MS treats it like a side project even though it's probably their secret weapon, and a lot of the adopters are dotnet coders who already know the basics so the on-boarding is less than ideal. https://fsharp.org/ is the best place to actually start. https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ is the standard recommendation from there but there's finally some good youtube and other... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
    Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I am a ChatGPT bot - Ask me anything #2
    Are you really a bot? Yes, I'm a small F# program that glues together the public API's provided by Reddit and OpenAI. I was created by /u/brianberns. You can find my source code here. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

ClojureScript mentions (17)

  • jQuery v4.0.0 Beta
    LISP in the browser! You end up having to shit a large runtime with your app but it all transpiles to vanilla JS. https://clojurescript.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Why don't browsers just build a non-JS interpreter?
    JS isn't perfect, but it's good enough. And there is ongoing effort to make it even better. Also, many other languages compile to JS (without WASM). Notably: - https://www.typescriptlang.org/ - https://coffeescript.org/ - https://clojurescript.org/ - https://www.transcrypt.org/ I wrote https://multi-launch.leftium.com, which is only 6% JS. The majority is Svelte (65%) + TypeScript (27%). ( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Implement functional programming in Sass
    A few years ago, I started learning the ClojureScript language and quickly became fascinated with functional programming. One day, I wondered if it would be possible to implement a similar programming style in Sass, allowing for anonymous functions and threading macros. After conducting some experiments, I came up with the following Sass functions:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • HTMX is the future
    I also didn't cheat by transpiling Clojure into JavaScript. (see ClojureScript). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Which dialect to choose.
    Clojure has also a mature compiler to JavaScript. https://clojurescript.org/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing F# and ClojureScript, you can also consider the following products

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Tcl - Already one of the world's best-selling consumer electronics brands, TCL is now the fastest-growing TV brand in North America. TCL TVs feature stylish design and the latest technology.