Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Explore GraphQL VS JsonAPI

Compare Explore GraphQL VS JsonAPI and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Explore GraphQL logo Explore GraphQL

GraphQL benefits, success stories, guides, and more

JsonAPI logo JsonAPI

Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, and Query Languages
  • Explore GraphQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • JsonAPI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-21

Explore GraphQL features and specs

  • Efficient Data Fetching
    GraphQL allows clients to specify exactly what data they need, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching of data compared to traditional REST APIs.
  • Flexible Queries
    Clients have the power to request different data structures with GraphQL without changing the backend, allowing for greater flexibility in data retrieval.
  • Strongly Typed Schema
    GraphQL APIs are defined by a strongly typed schema, which can lead to greater consistency and predictability in API responses.
  • Single Endpoint
    All interactions with a GraphQL API happen through a single endpoint, which can simplify the API architecture and management.
  • Ecosystem and Tooling
    GraphQL has a rich ecosystem of tools and features, such as introspection for automatic documentation, which make development more efficient.

Possible disadvantages of Explore GraphQL

  • Complexity of Implementation
    Setting up a GraphQL server can be complex, and it requires changes in existing architecture, especially in transitioning from REST APIs.
  • Over-fetching at the Client
    If not managed properly, clients might request more data than needed, leading to performance issues, unlike REST where endpoint responses are fixed.
  • Caching Difficulties
    GraphQL’s flexibility can make caching responses challenging because the same endpoint can return vastly different responses based on the query.
  • Security Concerns
    GraphQL can be vulnerable to query complexities and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks because clients have the flexibility to craft expensive queries.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers familiar with REST may face a learning curve when adapting to GraphQL's concepts and paradigms.

JsonAPI features and specs

  • Standardization
    JSON:API provides a standardized format for building APIs, which promotes consistency and interoperability between different APIs.
  • Efficiency
    It supports features like sparse fieldsets, compound documents, and included relationships which help in reducing the amount of data transferred and improving response times.
  • Decoupling
    JSON:API encourages a clear separation between client and server, allowing them to evolve independently as long as they adhere to the specification.
  • Error Handling
    It has a well-defined error format that makes it easier for clients to understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
  • Community and Tooling
    A growing community and increasing tooling support make it easier to implement JSON:API in various server-side and client-side technologies.

Possible disadvantages of JsonAPI

  • Complexity
    The specification can be complex and may introduce a learning curve for developers who are new to it or used to simpler REST approaches.
  • Overhead
    Strict adherence to the JSON:API specification can sometimes introduce additional overhead in terms of implementation effort, especially for small projects.
  • Flexibility
    While the standardization is beneficial, it can reduce flexibility in scenarios where a more customized or optimized solution is needed.
  • Adoption
    Although growing, JSON:API is not as widely adopted as other conventions like simple REST, and thus some developers and projects might resist switching to it.
  • Resource Intensive
    Some features of JSON:API, like relationship links and included resources, can become resource-intensive for the server if not implemented carefully.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Explore GraphQL and JsonAPI)
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
58 58%
42% 42
API Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Explore GraphQL and JsonAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JsonAPI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 50 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Explore GraphQL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Explore GraphQL yet. Tracking of Explore GraphQL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JsonAPI mentions (50)

  • Build Real-Time Knowledge Graph for Documents with LLM
    For context, the subject-predicate-object pattern is known as a semantic triple or Resource Description Framework (RDF) triple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_triple They're useful for storing social network graph data, for example, and can be expressed using standards like Open Graph and JSONAPI: https://ogp.me https://jsonapi.org I've stored RDF triples in database tables and experimented with query... - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • OSF API: The Complete Guide
    Built on JSON API standards, the OSF API is intuitive for anyone familiar with REST conventions. Once you learn its core patterns, you can quickly expand into project creation, user collaboration, and more—without constantly referencing documentation. The official OSF API docs provide everything needed to get started. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Common Mistakes in RESTful API Design
    Following established patterns reduces the learning curve for your API. Adopt conventions from JSON:API or Microsoft API Guidelines to provide consistent experiences. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Starting the Console front-end for Rainbow Platform
    I’ve used both GraphQL and REST in the past. From json:api to Relay, each approach for building APIs has its pros and cons. However, a constant challenge is choosing between code-first and schema-first approaches. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • REST API: Best practices and design
    There is a group of people who set out to standardize JSON responses into a single response style, either for returning single or multiple resources. You can take their style as a reference when designing their API to ensure uniformity of responses. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Explore GraphQL and JsonAPI, you can also consider the following products

How to GraphQL - Open-source tutorial website to learn GraphQL development

ReqRes - A hosted REST-API ready to respond to your AJAX requests.

GraphQL Playground - GraphQL IDE for better development workflows

graphql.js - A reference implementation of GraphQL for JavaScript - graphql/graphql-js

GraphQl Editor - Editor for GraphQL that lets you draw GraphQL schemas using visual nodes

Prisma GraphQL API - Prisma helps modern applications access and manipulate data through a unified data layer