Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Experimental Platform VS Nevercode

Compare Experimental Platform VS Nevercode and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Experimental Platform logo Experimental Platform

Easily build smart-device integrations with web technologies

Nevercode logo Nevercode

Continuous integration & delivery for mobile apps made easy. Build, test & release native & cross-platform apps faster with Nevercode. Sign up for free.
  • Experimental Platform Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-20
  • Nevercode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

Experimental Platform features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Nevercode features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Nevercode offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the continuous integration and delivery processes, making it accessible even for teams with limited CI/CD experience.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being a cloud-based solution, Nevercode eliminates the need for on-premise hardware setup and maintenance, reducing overhead costs and setup time.
  • Automated Testing
    Nevercode integrates with popular testing frameworks and provides robust automated testing capabilities, allowing for seamless continuous testing.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    Offers support for multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, and Flutter, making it a versatile choice for mobile app developers.
  • Scalability
    With cloud-based infrastructure, Nevercode can easily scale to accommodate growing teams and larger projects without significant upgrades.

Possible disadvantages of Nevercode

  • Cost
    Nevercode can be relatively expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • Limited Integration Options
    While it supports popular tools and frameworks, Nevercode's range of integrations is narrower compared to some competitors, potentially limiting its flexibility.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based service, Nevercode requires a stable internet connection to function effectively, which may be a drawback in scenarios with unreliable connectivity.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its intuitive interface, teams coming from different CI/CD tools might face an initial learning curve to fully leverage Nevercode's capabilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Experimental Platform and Nevercode)
Virtual Reality
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Chatbots
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Experimental Platform and Nevercode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Experimental Platform and Nevercode, you can also consider the following products

Reality Editor - MIT's new app lets you program any object

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Glue42 Core - The world's first open-source web app integration platform

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Losant IoT Platform - Build and visualize real-time IoT solutions with ease.

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed