Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Eureka VS JSON Web Token

Compare Eureka VS JSON Web Token and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Eureka logo Eureka

Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.
  • Eureka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-18
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

Eureka features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analytics
    Eureka provides in-depth conversation analytics that offer detailed insights into customer-agent interactions, which can improve customer service and operational efficiency.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    With real-time monitoring capabilities, Eureka allows businesses to track and respond to customer interactions as they happen, enabling prompt corrective actions.
  • Customization Options
    The platform is highly customizable, allowing businesses to tailor the analytics and reporting features to meet their specific needs and objectives.
  • Scalability
    Eureka is designed to cater to both small and large organizations, offering scalable solutions that can grow with a business's needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Eureka can be integrated with other business systems such as CRM and call center software, facilitating a seamless data exchange and enhanced customer interaction management.

Possible disadvantages of Eureka

  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive features, Eureka can be complex to set up and may require significant time and resources to fully implement and customize.
  • Cost
    The cost of implementing and maintaining Eureka may be high, especially for smaller businesses, given its advanced features and capabilities.
  • Training Requirements
    Users may require extensive training to effectively utilize all of Eureka's features, which can be a barrier for teams with limited resources.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Handling sensitive customer data through a third-party platform like Eureka may raise privacy concerns, requiring stringent data governance policies.
  • Dependence on Technology
    Relying heavily on a technological solution for customer interaction analysis may reduce emphasis on human judgment, potentially missing nuanced customer experiences.

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Eureka videos

Eureka Survey App Review - Big Fat SCAM EXPOSED!

More videos:

  • Review - Eureka TV Series Review - EASY GOING SCI-FI SERIES
  • Review - Eureka: TV Tuesday

JSON Web Token videos

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Eureka and JSON Web Token)
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Identity Provider
0 0%
100% 100
Web And Application Servers
Identity And Access Management

User comments

Share your experience with using Eureka and JSON Web Token. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 300 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Eureka mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Eureka yet. Tracking of Eureka recommendations started around Mar 2021.

JSON Web Token mentions (300)

  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Authentication and Authorization Best Practices in ASP.NET Core
    You can decode the created JWT token using JWT IO web site to see what's inside. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Use JWT Token In React JS
    JWT.io – A great resource to decode, verify, and generate JWT tokens. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 12 Must-Have Online Tools for Every Web Developer in 2025
    Category: Token Debugging & Authentication Link: jwt.io. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Eureka and JSON Web Token, you can also consider the following products

Apache ZooKeeper - Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

SkyDNS - DNS service discovery for etcd. Contribute to skynetservices/skydns development by creating an account on GitHub.

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...