Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register   |   Login

Erlang VS Asciidoctor

Compare Erlang VS Asciidoctor and see what are their differences


A programming language used to build massively scalable soft real-time systems with requirements on high availability

In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.
Erlang Landing Page
Erlang Landing Page
Asciidoctor Landing Page
Asciidoctor Landing Page

Erlang details

Categories
Programming Language OOP Generic Programming Language
Website erlang.org  

Asciidoctor details

Categories
Documentation Documentation As A Service & Tools Private Journal
Website asciidoctor.org  

Erlang videos

No Erlang videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Asciidoctor videos

Code your documentation with AsciiDoctor - open source is for everyone

More videos:

  • - [VDM19] Asciidoctor: because writing docs does not have to suck by Adres Almiray
  • - 10 Useful Asciidoctor Tips

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Erlang and Asciidoctor)
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100
100
100%
0%
0

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Asciidoctor should be more popular than Erlang. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Erlang mentions (1)

  • What is Calypso?
    However, as Elixir is inherently tied to the BEAM and Erlang/OTP, it means that it has features like immutable variables (though you can rebind them and have state via process loops, e.g. Agents or GenServers). This also means that OTP is the main "application framework" for Elixir/Erlang. In my opinion, OTP is a pretty good design philosophy for applications, but sometimes it's just kind of hard to set up or wrap... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

Asciidoctor mentions (4)

  • Technical documentation that just works
    For more complex technical documentation AsciiDoc would be a better fit than markdown. A simple table with code blocks is not possible with markdown, for example. I think the target audience is pretty much the same as for AsciiDoctor. https://asciidoctor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • On semantic markup language design, and how I ended up rolling my own
    Capable of semantic markup: like HTML/CSS, LaTeX or Asciidoc. That is, a language semantically Extensible enough so that true WYSIWYM can happen, allowing for a Better time at maintenance and refactorings in big projects. So no markdown And similarly semantically limited languages, which are a bit like text-based Attempts at WYSIWYG), if that is a Thing. - Source: Reddit / 3 months ago
  • Markdown, DocBook, and the quest for semantic documentation on NetBSD.org
    They shouldn't look at Asciidoc, they should look at Asciidoctor, an extended language: https://asciidoctor.org/ It would seem to fit particularly well, because it was specifically designed to cover DocBook as much as possible. That both helps with conversion and with the sematic markup requirements. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Erlang and Asciidoctor, you can also consider the following products

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

pandoc - Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...

Java - A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible

reStructuredText - Invented for Python documentation.

User reviews

Share your experience with using Erlang and Asciidoctor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review