Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Elm VS Scala Native

Compare Elm VS Scala Native and see what are their differences

Elm logo Elm

A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript

Scala Native logo Scala Native

Your favourite language gets closer to bare metal
  • Elm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-23

We recommend LibHunt Elm for discovery and comparisons of trending Elm projects.

  • Scala Native Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

Elm features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    Elm's type system is designed to catch errors at compile-time, reducing runtime errors and improving code reliability. It emphasizes immutability, making it easier to reason about and maintain code.
  • No Runtime Exceptions
    Elm enforces safety with its type system, ensuring that runtime exceptions are almost impossible. This leads to more robust and predictable applications.
  • Friendly Error Messages
    Elm's compiler provides exceptionally helpful and user-friendly error messages, which make debugging easier and learning the language more approachable.
  • Optimized Performance
    Elm's compiler generates highly optimized JavaScript, resulting in fast and efficient applications. Performance tuning is handled by the compiler, freeing developers from many optimization concerns.
  • Functional Programming
    Elm is purely functional, promoting a clear and declarative coding style. It encourages developers to write more predictable and maintainable code by leveraging functional programming principles.
  • Built-In Architecture
    The Elm Architecture (Model-Update-View) provides a consistent pattern for building applications, which can simplify the development process and improve code organization.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    Elm allows you to seamlessly integrate with existing JavaScript code through ports, giving you the flexibility to gradually adopt Elm or work with libraries that are not available in Elm.

Possible disadvantages of Elm

  • Small Ecosystem
    Elm's ecosystem is relatively small compared to more established languages like JavaScript or TypeScript, meaning there are fewer libraries and tools available, which might limit certain functionalities out of the box.
  • Learning Curve
    Elm’s functional programming paradigm and strict type system can be challenging for developers who are not familiar with functional programming, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Developer Community
    The Elm community is smaller compared to other languages, which can make finding support or example projects more difficult. This might also affect the availability of tutorials and learning resources.
  • Interoperability Overhead
    While interoperability with JavaScript is possible through ports, it introduces additional complexity and overhead, making integrated projects more challenging to manage.
  • Slower Release Cycle
    Elm's development and release cycle can be slower compared to other technologies. Updates and new features might take longer to be released, impacting the adoption of cutting-edge practices.
  • Single File Approach
    In Elm, managing large codebases can be problematic due to the lack of support for splitting code into multiple modules or files akin to solutions in other languages, which can make the code less modular and harder to navigate.

Scala Native features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Elm videos

Nightmare on Elm St (series review)

More videos:

  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) - Movie Review
  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master - Movie Review

Scala Native videos

No Scala Native videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Elm and Scala Native)
Programming Language
93 93%
7% 7
OOP
100 100%
0% 0
Data Extraction
0 0%
100% 100
Generic Programming Language

User comments

Share your experience with using Elm and Scala Native. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Elm seems to be a lot more popular than Scala Native. While we know about 123 links to Elm, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Scala Native. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Elm mentions (123)

  • 3 Options to Avoid Side-Effects in Web Dev
    Use languages that don’t have side-effects; Elm for UI, and Roc for API/CLI. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Reactivity in Programming
    Reactive programming itself is rarely found in pure form. It is often combined with other paradigms. This is how such mixes as Imperative Reactive Programming, Object-Oriented Reactive Programming and Functional Reactive Programming appeared. The latter is the most popular, and the Elm language is considered one of its main representatives. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Tsonnet #13 - Carets, columns, and clues: adding lexing error tracing
    I've drawn inspiration from Elm and the blog post Compiler Errors for Humans -- it is nearly a decade old and still inspiring to read. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • An Ode to TypeScript Enums
    When I see this it makes me want to run for ReasonML/ReScript/Elm/PureScript. Sum types (without payloads on the instances they are effectively enums) should not require a evening filling ceremonial dance event to define. https://reasonml.github.io/ https://rescript-lang.org/ https://elm-lang.org/ https://www.purescript.org/ (any I forgot?) It's nice that TS is a strict super set of JS... But that's about the only... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
    Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Scala Native mentions (2)

  • A 10x Faster TypeScript
    O'Caml is similar, now that it has multicore. Scala is also similar, though the native code side (https://scala-native.org/en/stable/) is not nearly as well developed as the JVM side. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Rust Web Framework
    Sounds like Scala Native: https://scala-native.org/en/stable. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Elm and Scala Native, you can also consider the following products

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

Improvado.io - Improvado is an ETL platform that extracts data from 300+ pre-built connectors, transforms it, and seamlessly loads the results to wherever you need them. No more Tedious Manual Work, Errors or Discrepancies. Contact us for a demo.

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

F# - F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...