Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Elm VS Blazor

Compare Elm VS Blazor and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Elm logo Elm

A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript

Blazor logo Blazor

An experimental web UI framework using C#/Razor and HTML, running in the browser via WebAssembly
  • Elm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-23

We recommend LibHunt Elm for discovery and comparisons of trending Elm projects.

  • Blazor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Elm features and specs

  • Strong Type System
    Elm's type system is designed to catch errors at compile-time, reducing runtime errors and improving code reliability. It emphasizes immutability, making it easier to reason about and maintain code.
  • No Runtime Exceptions
    Elm enforces safety with its type system, ensuring that runtime exceptions are almost impossible. This leads to more robust and predictable applications.
  • Friendly Error Messages
    Elm's compiler provides exceptionally helpful and user-friendly error messages, which make debugging easier and learning the language more approachable.
  • Optimized Performance
    Elm's compiler generates highly optimized JavaScript, resulting in fast and efficient applications. Performance tuning is handled by the compiler, freeing developers from many optimization concerns.
  • Functional Programming
    Elm is purely functional, promoting a clear and declarative coding style. It encourages developers to write more predictable and maintainable code by leveraging functional programming principles.
  • Built-In Architecture
    The Elm Architecture (Model-Update-View) provides a consistent pattern for building applications, which can simplify the development process and improve code organization.
  • Interoperability with JavaScript
    Elm allows you to seamlessly integrate with existing JavaScript code through ports, giving you the flexibility to gradually adopt Elm or work with libraries that are not available in Elm.

Possible disadvantages of Elm

  • Small Ecosystem
    Elm's ecosystem is relatively small compared to more established languages like JavaScript or TypeScript, meaning there are fewer libraries and tools available, which might limit certain functionalities out of the box.
  • Learning Curve
    Elm’s functional programming paradigm and strict type system can be challenging for developers who are not familiar with functional programming, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Limited Developer Community
    The Elm community is smaller compared to other languages, which can make finding support or example projects more difficult. This might also affect the availability of tutorials and learning resources.
  • Interoperability Overhead
    While interoperability with JavaScript is possible through ports, it introduces additional complexity and overhead, making integrated projects more challenging to manage.
  • Slower Release Cycle
    Elm's development and release cycle can be slower compared to other technologies. Updates and new features might take longer to be released, impacting the adoption of cutting-edge practices.
  • Single File Approach
    In Elm, managing large codebases can be problematic due to the lack of support for splitting code into multiple modules or files akin to solutions in other languages, which can make the code less modular and harder to navigate.

Blazor features and specs

  • Single Language
    Blazor allows developers to use C# for both client-side and server-side development, reducing the need to switch between different languages and enhancing developer productivity.
  • Full-Stack Development
    With Blazor, developers can build full-stack web applications using .NET, leveraging the vast .NET ecosystem and tools.
  • WebAssembly Support
    Blazor WebAssembly enables running C# code directly in the browser, allowing for rich interactive web applications with less reliance on JavaScript.
  • Reusability
    Blazor promotes code reusability by allowing shared code between server and client-side applications.
  • Components-Based Architecture
    It uses a component-based architecture that facilitates easier maintenance of code and enhances modularity.

Possible disadvantages of Blazor

  • Performance Limits
    Blazor WebAssembly can have slower performance compared to JavaScript due to its intermediated execution through WebAssembly.
  • Download Size
    Blazor WebAssembly applications can have larger initial download sizes, which can affect load times and user experience.
  • Newness
    As a relatively new technology, the Blazor community is still growing, which can sometimes limit the availability of third-party tools and resources.
  • Limited Browser Support
    Some older browsers do not support WebAssembly, potentially reducing the reach of Blazor applications if not accounted for.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers familiar with JavaScript frameworks may encounter a learning curve when transitioning to Blazor and the .NET ecosystem.

Elm videos

+ Add

Nightmare on Elm St (series review)

More videos:

  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) - Movie Review
  • Review - A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master - Movie Review

Blazor videos

+ Add

Is Blazor A JavaScript Killer?

More videos:

  • Review - Blazor vs JavaScript frameworks
  • Review - Blazor server-side vs client-side (WebAssembly) | What should you choose?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Elm and Blazor)

Elm

Blazor

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
OOP
100 100%
OOP
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Elm and Blazor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Elm and Blazor

Elm Reviews

We have no reviews of Elm yet.
Be the first one to post

Blazor Reviews

Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives
One advantage Blazor introduces comes around security-sensitive use cases. With .NET powering backend, client, and shared application logic, Blazor simplifies applying consistent security principles systemwide. The robust .NET encryption libraries integrate cleanly to protect network and device data. Single unified user authentication flows minimize risk exposure through...
Source: positiwise.medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Elm seems to be a lot more popular than Blazor. While we know about 123 links to Elm, we've tracked only 7 mentions of Blazor. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Elm mentions (123)

  • 3 Options to Avoid Side-Effects in Web Dev
    Use languages that don’t have side-effects; Elm for UI, and Roc for API/CLI. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Reactivity in Programming
    Reactive programming itself is rarely found in pure form. It is often combined with other paradigms. This is how such mixes as Imperative Reactive Programming, Object-Oriented Reactive Programming and Functional Reactive Programming appeared. The latter is the most popular, and the Elm language is considered one of its main representatives. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Tsonnet #13 - Carets, columns, and clues: adding lexing error tracing
    I've drawn inspiration from Elm and the blog post Compiler Errors for Humans -- it is nearly a decade old and still inspiring to read. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • An Ode to TypeScript Enums
    When I see this it makes me want to run for ReasonML/ReScript/Elm/PureScript. Sum types (without payloads on the instances they are effectively enums) should not require a evening filling ceremonial dance event to define. https://reasonml.github.io/ https://rescript-lang.org/ https://elm-lang.org/ https://www.purescript.org/ (any I forgot?) It's nice that TS is a strict super set of JS... But that's about the only... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • TypeScript's Lack of Naming Types and Type Conversion in Angular
    Elm, ReScript, F#, Ocaml, Scala… it’s just normal to name your types, then use them places. In fact, you’ll often create the types _before_ the code, even if you’re not really practicing DDD (Domain Driven Design). Yes, you’ll do many after the fact when doing functions, or you start testing things and decide to change your design, and make new types. Either way, it’s just “the norm”. You then do the other norms... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Blazor mentions (7)

  • Blazor and .NET 8: How I Built a Fast and Flexible Website
    I’ve been working on a new website for my series CSharp in the Cards. I built this website in a way that was easy to maintain, flexible and most importantly would respond quickly to requests from visitors. I knew that Blazor with .NET 8 had a static server rendering feature and decided that I wanted to put it to the test. I recently published a new lesson to the website and included a web assembly component to... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • #12: Headless CMS & SWA - Built With Blazor
    Over the last few days we've been exploring JavaScript-based frameworks for building web apps. Today, we switch our attention to our amazing .NET community and talk about building Static Web Apps with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • What is a good reason to consider Blazor?
    Hi there. I'm the Program Manager at Microsoft for Blazor, so naturally I'm happy to make the Blazor pitch 😊. If you're comfortable already with JS/TS then it's understandable that Blazor might not have as strong an appeal. Blazor is all about enabling full stack web development with just .NET & C# without having to write JavaScript. But even if you are a JS/TS fan, it's still very convenient to operate fully... Source: over 3 years ago
  • My Favorite C# Features - Part 5: Build for the Modern Web with Blazor
    Building web applications with Blazor is a great way for developers who enjoy C# and .NET to create interactive web applications. I encourage you to check out the Blazor 101 video series published on YouTube and check out https://blazor.net for more learning materials and the tools to get started with Blazor. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • What to Expect in .NET 6
    Blazor has become a smart way to build .NET web applications. This is because of its seamlessness and ease of integration with UI libraries like ComponentOne. This makes the application development life cycle more efficient. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Elm and Blazor, you can also consider the following products

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

ASP.NET Core - With ASP.

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Microsoft PowerApps - Microsoft PowerApps provides tools to create, customize, share and run apps.

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.

Retool - Build custom internal tools in minutes.

Loading...