Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EJS VS Typescript

Compare EJS VS Typescript and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

Typescript logo Typescript

TypeScript allows developers to compile a superset of JavaScript to plain JavaScript on any browser, host, or operating system.
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11
  • Typescript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-12

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Typescript features and specs

  • Static Typing
    Typescript adds optional static typing to JavaScript, which allows for early error detection and better IntelliSense support.
  • Improved Code Quality
    The type system encourages developers to write more robust and maintainable code by enforcing the definition of types.
  • Enhanced IDE Support
    Most modern IDEs offer better code navigation, autocompletion, and refactoring tools for TypeScript due to its type information.
  • Compatibility
    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, meaning existing JavaScript code is valid TypeScript, and it can interoperate with JavaScript libraries.
  • Scalability
    TypeScript’s type system makes it easier to manage and scale large codebases, improving team collaboration.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    A large and growing community provides a wealth of resources, libraries, and tools tailored to TypeScript development.

Possible disadvantages of Typescript

  • Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a JavaScript background may need time to familiarize themselves with TypeScript concepts and syntax.
  • Build Step Requirement
    TypeScript code needs to be compiled to JavaScript, adding a build step to the development workflow.
  • Overhead
    The additional type annotations can lead to more verbose code, which may be seen as unnecessary overhead in smaller projects.
  • Tooling and Configuration
    Setting up TypeScript can sometimes be complex, requiring additional configuration for projects and integrations with various build tools.
  • Slower Iteration Speed
    The compilation process can slightly slow down the development cycle compared to working directly with JavaScript.
  • Strictness
    TypeScript’s strict type checks can sometimes be limiting, requiring workarounds or more complex type definitions.

EJS videos

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Typescript videos

All You Need To Know About TypeScript

More videos:

  • Review - JavaScript or TypeScript?
  • Review - GOTO 2018 • Why I Was Wrong About TypeScript • TJ VanToll

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJS and Typescript)
Javascript UI Libraries
71 71%
29% 29
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and Typescript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare EJS and Typescript

EJS Reviews

We have no reviews of EJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Typescript Reviews

Top 5 Most Liked and Hated Programming Languages of 2022
TypeScript is an open-source programming language that is here to beat the shortcomings of JavaScript. Yet another remarkable feature of this programming language that is worth a mention is that the TypeScript code converts to JavaScript. The ability of this language to understand JavaScript and use type inference to give the user great tooling without additional code is...

Social recommendations and mentions

Typescript might be a bit more popular than EJS. We know about 27 links to it since March 2021 and only 26 links to EJS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

Typescript mentions (27)

  • Minimalist blog with Zola, AWS CDK, and Tailwind CSS - Part 1
    What are we going to do today? We're going to build a minimalist blog using Zola (built with Rust, btw), AWS CDK, Tailwind CSS, and a tiny bit of Typescript. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Node.js: A brief history of cjs, bundlers, and esm
    Over time, esm became widely adopted by developers thanks to bundlers and languages like TypeScript since they are capable of transforming esm syntax into cjs. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    Vitest supports ECMAScript modules (ESM), TypeScript out of the box. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • 🎓 Monorepo College Lecture 2: Build Me Up Buttercup
    In this part, we will be initializing the project, getting all of the initial files out of the way and then configure Prettier as well as create the first package of our monorepo which will be a tsconfig package responsible for sharing TypeScript configuration files to the other packages we will create in the future. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • When type can be null or an array
    The owners of TypeScript need to do a better job at documenting language features. I always know that some sort of null/undefined handling is available but can never remember the name of the operators. And when you browse or search typescriptlang.org you cannot even find any docs on null forgiving operators. They spend more time detailing how JSX works than they do the basics of the language. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EJS and Typescript, you can also consider the following products

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

WPMU DEV - WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.