Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

EJBCA VS Composer

Compare EJBCA VS Composer and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

EJBCA logo EJBCA

EJBCA® is a PKI Certificate Authority software, built using Java (JEE) technology.

Composer logo Composer

Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.
  • EJBCA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26
  • Composer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

EJBCA features and specs

  • Open Source
    EJBCA is open-source, which means you can access, modify, and distribute the software freely. This leads to cost savings and the flexibility to customize the software to meet your specific needs.
  • Comprehensive Features
    EJBCA offers a comprehensive set of features for certificate management, including issuance, revocation, validation, and a wide range of PKI functions. This makes it suitable for various applications and industries.
  • Scalability
    EJBCA is designed to handle large deployments, making it suitable for enterprises or organizations with extensive PKI infrastructures and the need for handling numerous certificates.
  • Standards Compliance
    EJBCA complies with numerous industry standards like X.509, RFC 5280, and others, ensuring interoperability with other systems and adherence to accepted security protocols.
  • Community Support
    As an open-source project, EJBCA benefits from an active community of users and contributors who can offer support, share knowledge, and contribute to the continuous improvement of the software.

Possible disadvantages of EJBCA

  • Complexity
    EJBCA's comprehensive feature set and flexibility can result in a steep learning curve for new users, requiring a deep understanding of PKI concepts and the software itself.
  • Resource Intensive
    Setting up and maintaining an EJBCA deployment can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware and skilled personnel to manage and optimize the system.
  • Limited User Interface
    The user interface of EJBCA may not be as polished or intuitive as some commercial CA solutions, potentially making administration tasks more challenging for less technical users.
  • Support and Documentation
    While there is community support, the quality and availability of official documentation and professional support might be less comprehensive compared to commercial software with dedicated support teams.
  • Initial Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of EJBCA can be complex and time-consuming, necessitating careful planning and execution to ensure that security and operational needs are met.

Composer features and specs

  • Dependency Management
    Composer allows for easy and efficient management of PHP dependencies, ensuring that the correct versions are used and conflicts are minimized.
  • Autoloading
    Composer supports autoloading, which means you don't have to manually include or require files, reducing boilerplate code.
  • Version Control
    It allows developers to specify and install the exact versions of the libraries they need, which helps in maintaining consistency across different environments.
  • Community Support
    Composer has a vast and active community, resulting in a plethora of libraries and packages readily available for use.
  • PSR Compliance
    Composer adheres to PHP-FIG PSR standards, promoting best practices and interoperability among PHP projects.
  • Custom Repositories
    Ability to use custom repositories allows for flexibility, enabling enterprises to create their own repository for internal use.

Possible disadvantages of Composer

  • Learning Curve
    Beginners may find Composer overwhelming due to its command-line interface and the complexity of managing dependencies.
  • Performance
    Installing or updating packages can sometimes be slow, particularly for projects with many dependencies.
  • Dependency Conflicts
    While Composer aims to minimize conflicts, complex projects can still face issues with dependency resolution that require manual intervention.
  • File Size
    Projects using Composer can lead to increased file sizes due to the inclusion of multiple libraries and their dependencies.
  • Security
    Including third-party packages can expose a project to potential security vulnerabilities if those packages are not well-maintained or audited.

EJBCA videos

How to integrate PrimeKey EJBCA Enterprise with Luna SA for Government HSM

More videos:

  • Review - EJBCA Installation in Ubuntu Linux

Composer videos

AI vs Human Music Composer 2019 - Orb Composer Review

More videos:

  • Review - Review Composer Cloud from EastWest / Soundsonline.com
  • Review - Behringer Composer PRO-XL MDX2600 Review (AUDIO TEST)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJBCA and Composer)
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Password Management
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using EJBCA and Composer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Composer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 143 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJBCA mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of EJBCA yet. Tracking of EJBCA recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Composer mentions (143)

  • Arguments a customer can understand not to use WordPress
    There is also no requirement to follow the PHP-FIG standards. The best thing that is build because of those standards is Composer. The most plugins I downloaded while writing use composer. The problem is that the plugins ship with their own vendor directory. While the standard is to have one vendor directory for the whole project. This results in different packages with the same or different version of it in the... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Insights from the PHP Foundation Executive Director
    “Extensions are now very close to being like packages; they basically look like Composer packages. It’s still open to discussion whether PIE will be part of Composer someday. It’s not decided yet, but I hope it will be,” Roman added. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
  • PHP Core Security Audit Results
    Dependencies are managed by Composer (like npm, cargo, etc) for more than 10 years now. https://getcomposer.org. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
  • WordPress and Components
    Composer and Packagist have become key tools for establishing the foundations of PHP-based applications. Packagist is essentially a directory containing PHP code out of which Composer, a PHP-dependency manager, retrieves packages. Their ease of use and exceptional features simplify the process of importing and managing own and third-party components into our PHP projects. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 2025 Best PHP Micro Frameworks: Slim, Flight, Fat-Free, Lumen, and More!
    Simplicity: Getting started is a breeze—install via Composer, define some routes, and you’re off. Scaling up? Add middleware or libs like Twig or Eloquent as needed. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing EJBCA and Composer, you can also consider the following products

OpenXPKI - OpenXPKI is a software stack that provides all necessary components to manage keys and certificates...

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Portecle - Portecle is a user friendly GUI application for creating, managing and examining keystores, keys...

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

TinyCA - TinyCA is a simple graphical userinterface written in Perl/Gtk to manage a small CA (Certification...

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.