Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

OpenXPKI VS Composer

Compare OpenXPKI VS Composer and see what are their differences

Momen
Build powerful web apps, and create your custom AI apps, no code needed! featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OpenXPKI logo OpenXPKI

OpenXPKI is a software stack that provides all necessary components to manage keys and certificates...

Composer logo Composer

Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.
  • OpenXPKI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-05
  • Composer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

OpenXPKI features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenXPKI is an open-source project, which means it is free to use and can be modified or extended by anyone to suit their specific needs.
  • Feature-Rich
    It offers a comprehensive set of features for certificate management, including support for multiple certificate authorities, automated workflows, and distributed operation.
  • Flexibility
    OpenXPKI is highly flexible, allowing users to customize workflows and policies to match their organizational requirements.
  • Community Support
    There is an active community of developers and users who contribute to the project, which helps in getting support and improving the platform.
  • Scalability
    The architecture of OpenXPKI is designed to be scalable, making it suitable for small to large installations.

Possible disadvantages of OpenXPKI

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration of OpenXPKI can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a deeper understanding of PKI concepts.
  • Limited Documentation
    Although there is documentation available, some users may find it inadequate or challenging to navigate, especially for advanced configurations.
  • Maintenance Requirements
    As with many open-source projects, users need to manage updates and maintenance themselves, which can be resource-intensive.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with public key infrastructure (PKI) may encounter a steep learning curve when using OpenXPKI.
  • Potential for Configuration Errors
    Due to its flexibility and complexity, there is potential for errors in configuration, which can lead to security or operational issues.

Composer features and specs

  • Dependency Management
    Composer allows for easy and efficient management of PHP dependencies, ensuring that the correct versions are used and conflicts are minimized.
  • Autoloading
    Composer supports autoloading, which means you don't have to manually include or require files, reducing boilerplate code.
  • Version Control
    It allows developers to specify and install the exact versions of the libraries they need, which helps in maintaining consistency across different environments.
  • Community Support
    Composer has a vast and active community, resulting in a plethora of libraries and packages readily available for use.
  • PSR Compliance
    Composer adheres to PHP-FIG PSR standards, promoting best practices and interoperability among PHP projects.
  • Custom Repositories
    Ability to use custom repositories allows for flexibility, enabling enterprises to create their own repository for internal use.

Possible disadvantages of Composer

  • Learning Curve
    Beginners may find Composer overwhelming due to its command-line interface and the complexity of managing dependencies.
  • Performance
    Installing or updating packages can sometimes be slow, particularly for projects with many dependencies.
  • Dependency Conflicts
    While Composer aims to minimize conflicts, complex projects can still face issues with dependency resolution that require manual intervention.
  • File Size
    Projects using Composer can lead to increased file sizes due to the inclusion of multiple libraries and their dependencies.
  • Security
    Including third-party packages can expose a project to potential security vulnerabilities if those packages are not well-maintained or audited.

OpenXPKI videos

No OpenXPKI videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Composer videos

+ Add

AI vs Human Music Composer 2019 - Orb Composer Review

More videos:

  • Review - Review Composer Cloud from EastWest / Soundsonline.com
  • Review - Behringer Composer PRO-XL MDX2600 Review (AUDIO TEST)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenXPKI and Composer)

OpenXPKI

Composer

Digital Signage
100 100%
Digital Signage
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100
Password Management
100 100%
Password Management
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenXPKI and Composer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Composer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 143 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenXPKI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OpenXPKI yet. Tracking of OpenXPKI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Composer mentions (143)

  • Arguments a customer can understand not to use WordPress
    There is also no requirement to follow the PHP-FIG standards. The best thing that is build because of those standards is Composer. The most plugins I downloaded while writing use composer. The problem is that the plugins ship with their own vendor directory. While the standard is to have one vendor directory for the whole project. This results in different packages with the same or different version of it in the... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Insights from the PHP Foundation Executive Director
    “Extensions are now very close to being like packages; they basically look like Composer packages. It’s still open to discussion whether PIE will be part of Composer someday. It’s not decided yet, but I hope it will be,” Roman added. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
  • PHP Core Security Audit Results
    Dependencies are managed by Composer (like npm, cargo, etc) for more than 10 years now. https://getcomposer.org. - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago
  • WordPress and Components
    Composer and Packagist have become key tools for establishing the foundations of PHP-based applications. Packagist is essentially a directory containing PHP code out of which Composer, a PHP-dependency manager, retrieves packages. Their ease of use and exceptional features simplify the process of importing and managing own and third-party components into our PHP projects. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • 2025 Best PHP Micro Frameworks: Slim, Flight, Fat-Free, Lumen, and More!
    Simplicity: Getting started is a breeze—install via Composer, define some routes, and you’re off. Scaling up? Add middleware or libs like Twig or Eloquent as needed. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenXPKI and Composer, you can also consider the following products

EJBCA - EJBCA® is a PKI Certificate Authority software, built using Java (JEE) technology.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Portecle - Portecle is a user friendly GUI application for creating, managing and examining keystores, keys...

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

TinyCA - TinyCA is a simple graphical userinterface written in Perl/Gtk to manage a small CA (Certification...

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Loading...