Editor.js

Website

codex.so

$ Details

-

Categories

#Text Editors #Rich Text Editor #WYSIWYG Editor #IDEs And Text Editors

Trumbowyg

Website

alex-d.github.io

$ Details

Categories

#Text Editors #Rich Text Editor #IDEs And Text Editors #WYSIWYG Editor

Editor.js features and specs

• Modular Architecture
  Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
• Block Style Editor
  The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
• Clean JSON Output
  Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
• API Flexibility
  Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
• Lightweight & Fast
  The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
• Open Source
  As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
• Rich Plugin Ecosystem
  A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

• Steep Learning Curve
  While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
• Limited Built-In Tools
  Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
• Dependency on JavaScript
  Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
• Plugin Compatibility
  Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
• Configuration Complexity
  Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
• Lack of Native Features
  Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
• Accessibility Concerns
  Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Trumbowyg features and specs

• Lightweight
  Trumbowyg is designed to be a small and efficient WYSIWYG editor, with its core being only a few kilobytes. This ensures fast loading times and minimal impact on application performance.
• Customizable
  The editor offers a range of options and configurations, allowing developers to tailor it to specific requirements and integrate it seamlessly with existing applications.
• Open Source
  Trumbowyg is open-source, meaning developers can contribute to its improvement and adapt the code to suit particular needs, fostering a community-driven approach.
• Plugin Support
  It has an array of plugins that extend its functionality, enabling users to add only the features they need, such as file uploads, color picker, or emoji support.
• Responsive Design
  Trumbowyg is mobile-friendly and adjusts well to different screen sizes, providing a consistent user experience across devices.

Possible disadvantages of Trumbowyg

• Limited Features
  Compared to more comprehensive editors, Trumbowyg may lack advanced functionalities that some developers might require out of the box.
• Dependency on jQuery
  Trumbowyg relies on jQuery, which adds an additional dependency for modern projects where jQuery is not already used.
• Sparse Documentation
  While there is documentation available, it can be sparse and lacking in detail, which may pose a challenge for developers trying to implement advanced configurations.
• Smaller Community
  Being a less popular editor compared to giants like CKEditor or TinyMCE means that the community and third-party resources are relatively limited.

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

Larablog | 20 Trumbowyg