Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SCEditor VS Editor.js

Compare SCEditor VS Editor.js and see what are their differences

SCEditor logo SCEditor

A lightweight WYSIWYG BBCode & HTML editor

Editor.js logo Editor.js

A block-styled editor with clean JSON output
  • SCEditor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-12
  • Editor.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

SCEditor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    SCEditor provides an intuitive and straightforward user interface that makes it easy for both developers and end-users to format text and create rich content.
  • Customization Options
    The editor is highly customizable, allowing developers to tweak the toolbar, buttons, and themes to better fit the needs of their projects.
  • Lightweight
    SCEditor is designed to be lightweight, ensuring fast load times and performance, which is particularly beneficial for websites looking to optimize speed.
  • Wide Browser Support
    The editor supports a wide range of browsers, ensuring compatibility and functionality across different platforms and devices.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, SCEditor encourages community involvement and contributions, leading to continuous improvements and updates.

Possible disadvantages of SCEditor

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other rich text editors, SCEditor may lack some advanced features that are essential for certain complex use cases.
  • Documentation
    Some users may find the documentation lacking in depth or clarity, which can pose challenges during implementation or customization.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for SCEditor is not as extensive as some other editors, which can limit its functionality out-of-the-box.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around SCEditor, it is not as large as some other editors, which may lead to slower responses to issues or fewer community-driven resources.

Editor.js features and specs

  • Modular Architecture
    Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
  • Block Style Editor
    The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
  • Clean JSON Output
    Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
  • API Flexibility
    Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
  • Lightweight & Fast
    The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages of Editor.js

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
  • Limited Built-In Tools
    Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
  • Dependency on JavaScript
    Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
  • Lack of Native Features
    Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
  • Accessibility Concerns
    Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

SCEditor videos

No SCEditor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Editor.js videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos:

  • Review - umbraCoffee #079 - Editor.js, tide flows, and Codegarden blues

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SCEditor and Editor.js)
Text Editors
37 37%
63% 63
Rich Text Editor
37 37%
63% 63
IDEs And Text Editors
42 42%
58% 58
Tool
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using SCEditor and Editor.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare SCEditor and Editor.js

SCEditor Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
SCEditor is yet another simple open-source WYSIWYG editor. It may not be popular enough, but it has been actively maintained for more than six years since publishing.
Source: itsfoss.com
Looking for a CKEditor? Try these 10 Alternatives
With its small footprint and straightforward API, SCEditor is a great option for developers who want to add a lightweight, yet comprehensive, text editor to their web applications. You can also add plugins extending the editor’s functionality or supporting specific use cases.

Editor.js Reviews

14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.
Source: itsfoss.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SCEditor and Editor.js, you can also consider the following products

CKEditor - Real-time collaborative future-ready rich text editor

TinyMCE - TinyMCE is a content editor that functions as a plug-in for Wordpress websites.

Quill - Powerful, API-driven rich text editor

Trumbowyg - Feature-packed WYSIWYG editor in only 15kB of JavaScript

Summernote - Summernote is a JavaScript library that helps users create WYSIWYG editors online.

Aloha Editor - Aloha Editor is an HTML5 WYSIWYG Editor that gives you a total new experience when editing.