Dorik VS Jekyll

Dorik Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

Dorik mentions (12)

• 15 tools to help you build your landing page (even if you can't code)

  Dorik = A no-code website builder with CMS built into it at a very affordable price. Source: 6 months ago

• Softr list block free alternative

  You can build beautiful stuff with your AirTable data using https://dorik.com/ and they have affordable annual pricing so you can solve this for $50/year. Source: over 1 year ago

• best platform to create a booking app

  If you are looking for something with a lower learning curve then Bubble I once created a booking form with Paperform.com I also saw that dorik.com has e booking function (template example: https://hotelse.dcms.site/). Source: over 1 year ago

• Need help in figuring what no code platform to use?

  You can have a look at Dorik if you are trying to build a landing page or a full-fledged website for your business within minutes. Dorik has plenty of beautiful templates for almost all sort of businesses. So, you will surely find the one that will meet your needs. Furthermore, the platform comes with 140+ amazing UI blocks and 25+ elements which will help you to design your website stunningly. Check out the... Source: almost 2 years ago

• Best tool to create a job board/directory type of website

  Try u/dorik_io, a simple no-code landing page builder. Moreover, if you have any issues using this platform, their live support team will help you out without any delay.https://dorik.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago

Jekyll mentions (181)

• On the road to ramen profitability 🍜 💸

  A basic marketing site built-on Jekyll and hosted via Cloudflare Pages. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago