Dokan VS Tuxera NTFS for Mac

I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

I've day dreamed about having a tag based file system where a file path (URI) in which each segment is a tag. So path /image/red is the same as /red/image. File extensions would be part of the tags too. Been a while since I looked at my notes, but I think I originally was thinking of searching /red would show all files that have that tag ranked. File system base is nice because then the custom system works for... Source: almost 3 years ago

As an alternative to Paragon NTFS, there is also Tuxera NTFS for Mac. Source: 10 months ago

I would try Tuxera. They do have a trial version but the purchased license is only $15. Might be worth giving it a try. Source: 12 months ago

If you still need to access the data on Windows machines then I recommend Tuxera. https://ntfsformac.tuxera.com/. It will give you full R/W access to the drive. I’ve been using it for years. There is no subscription just a one time payment and you have access to all future updates. Source: about 1 year ago

You should typically have no issue reading from the NTFS disk with a Mac but writing to is a separate matter. The driver you were using may not be compatible with Ventura. Here are a couple paid options: Paragon NTFS, along with NTFS for Mac. There are also a couple open-source options with limited support but should be otherwise functional: NTFS-3G or macFUSE. Source: about 1 year ago

You can try this one https://ntfsformac.tuxera.com/ works great and it is cheaper than paragon. Source: over 1 year ago