Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Dokan SSHFS VS OSXFUSE

Compare Dokan SSHFS VS OSXFUSE and see what are their differences

Dokan SSHFS logo Dokan SSHFS

Dokan SSHFS is a program that mounts remote file systems using SSH.

OSXFUSE logo OSXFUSE

FUSE for OS X allows you to extend OS X's native file handling capabilities via third-party...
  • Dokan SSHFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • OSXFUSE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

Dokan SSHFS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

OSXFUSE features and specs

  • User Space File Systems
    OSXFUSE allows the creation of fully functional file systems in user space. This facilitates development by not requiring changes to kernel code, reducing the risk of affecting system stability.
  • Flexibility
    Developers can implement a wide variety of file systems with different abstractions and benefits, tailored for specific tasks or unique applications.
  • Wide Range of Use Cases
    OSXFUSE supports various applications, from cloud storage solutions and encrypted file systems to unique file abstractions, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, OSXFUSE benefits from community contributions, documentation, and shared implementations that can aid development and problem-solving.
  • Cross-Platform Development
    OSXFUSE's similarity to FUSE on other Unix-like systems simplifies cross-platform development and porting of file systems.

Possible disadvantages of OSXFUSE

  • Performance Overhead
    Running file system operations in user space can introduce additional latency compared to kernel-based file systems, potentially affecting performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring OSXFUSE and its corresponding file systems might be challenging, especially for users not familiar with terminal commands or file system concepts.
  • Security Concerns
    User space file systems could introduce security vulnerabilities if not implemented carefully, as bugs can lead to data corruption or unauthorized access.
  • Limited Kernel Integration
    Since OSXFUSE operates in user space, it may not have the same deep integration and performance optimizations available to in-kernel file systems.

Dokan SSHFS videos

No Dokan SSHFS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OSXFUSE videos

Apple: OSXFuse & VeraCrypt on Big Sur: OSXFuse seems to be missing on your machine (2 Solutions!!)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Dokan SSHFS and OSXFUSE)
FTP Client
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
22 22%
78% 78
Storage
0 0%
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Dokan SSHFS and OSXFUSE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OSXFUSE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Dokan SSHFS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Dokan SSHFS yet. Tracking of Dokan SSHFS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OSXFUSE mentions (31)

  • Please someone save me from file sharing hell to windows
    I didn't exactly use any 'tutorial'. Assumming you can already SSH to the target machine, you just need to install both these pkgs then reboot to 1TR Recovery Mode and choosing Reduced Security and choose to enable Kernel Extension and then reboot again goto Security & Privacy and Allow the extension, and that's it you can now use it. Source: over 1 year ago
  • How do I fix this?
    Weird. Where did you download (lat/new)est MacFuse from? https://osxfuse.github.io/ I hope! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some good resources for learning about low level disk/file IO?
    I lead a project that included shipping a filesystem driver and a virtual disk on Windows. What I did to learn the lower-level APIs, and perform initial testing on the driver, was write a "mirror" drive. The user-mode code pointed to a folder on disk, the driver made a virtual disk drive, and all reads and writes in the virtual disk drive went to the mirror folder. On Windows, you can implement something like that... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Possible to use VeraCrypt without OSXFuse
    "FUSE-T is a kext-less implementation of FUSE for macOS that uses NFS v4 local server instead of a kernel extension. The main motivation for this project is to replace macfuse (https://osxfuse.github.io/) that implements its own kext to make fuse work. With each version of macOS it's getting harder and harder to load kernel extensions. Apple strongly discourages it and, for this reason, software distributions... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • mount harddisk with different formats
    Macos doesn’t support many Linux file system formats. You’ll have to use something like macFUSE https://osxfuse.github.io/. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Dokan SSHFS and OSXFUSE, you can also consider the following products

WinFsp - WinFsp, Windows File System Proxy, is a set of software components for Windows computers that...

Tuxera NTFS for Mac - Microsoft NTFS for Mac by Tuxera brings reliable read-write compatibility for all NTFS-formatted USB drives on your Mac. Try free for 15 days.

sshfs - This is a filesystem client based on the SSH File Transfer Protocol.

Mounty for NTFS - A tiny tool to re-mount write-protected NTFS volumes under Mac OS X 10.9+ in read-write mode.

SSHFS-Win - SSHFS-Win is a minimal port of SSHFS to Windows.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...