Diff VS mozjpeg

Diff

Prototype and share changes to your site with no coding

mozjpeg

Mozilla JPEG Encoder Project

Landing page //
2019-03-07

Landing page //
2023-08-04

Diff

Website: getdiff.app
Categories: #Development #Design Tools #Prototyping #Monitoring Tools

Edit details

mozjpeg

Website: github.com
Categories: #Game Development #Game Engine #3D Game Engine #Developer Tools

Edit details

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Diff and mozjpeg)

mozjpeg

Design Tools

100 100%

Design Tools

0% 0

Game Development

0 0%

Game Development

100% 100

Prototyping

45 45%

Prototyping

55% 55

Game Engine

0 0%

Game Engine

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Diff and mozjpeg. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mozjpeg seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Diff mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Diff yet. Tracking of Diff recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mozjpeg mentions (13)

It's the future – you can stop using JPEGs
It would be nice if the author would add mozjpeg[1] to the comparison. At certain sizes, it can produce smaller sizes than WebP, and because it is still a jpeg, it has a much better compatibility story, which the author alluded to. [1]https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Random Code Inspiration Volume 2
Image-shrinker is a simple, easy to use open source tool for shrinking images. Under the hood it uses pngquant, mozjpg, SVGO, and gifsicle. You can also install these tools individually if you need to compress some images. I often use pngquantafter exporting PNGs for web projects from Figma or similar tools. I literally run it like this:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
JPEG XL: How It Started, How It’s Going
> MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-encoder-proj.... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Why there may never be a libjpeg-turbo 3.1
FWIW, Mozilla has been maintaining their own fork for quite a while now[1] AFAIK most Linux Distros have been using libjpeg-turbo as a drop-in replacement for libjpeg, after some drama in ~2010 where libjpeg came under new management, decided to break ABI/API several times over and add incompatible, non-standard format extensions[2]. [1] https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Are all JPEG compression implementations the same?
No. See https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg Also, there is a fairly big problem with JPG that the ‘quality’ setting is not calibrated. That is you might look at one image and think it looks fine (which is subjective, depends on what you want to use the image for…) with a quality of 60%, but then you compress a million images at that rate, delete the originals, then... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago