Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Dhall Configuration Language VS XML

Compare Dhall Configuration Language VS XML and see what are their differences

Dhall Configuration Language logo Dhall Configuration Language

A non-repetitive alternative to YAML

XML logo XML

Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a markup language that defines a set of rules for encoding...
  • Dhall Configuration Language Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-27
  • XML Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-06-20

Dhall Configuration Language features and specs

  • Deterministic
    Dhall is designed to be a deterministic configuration language, meaning that given the same input, it will always produce the same output. This ensures consistency and repeatability across environments.
  • Type-Safe
    Dhall includes a strong static type system, preventing many common errors associated with misconfigurations. Types are checked at compile time, ensuring configuration values meet specific criteria before deployment.
  • Total Programming Language
    Unlike many other configuration languages, Dhall is a total functional programming language, which means every program written in Dhall will terminate. This prevents infinite loops and other runtime issues.
  • Interoperability
    Dhall can generate JSON, YAML, and other data interchange formats, making it highly interoperable with existing systems that require these formats for configuration.
  • Modular
    Dhall allows for modular configuration files. You can define reusable components and import them across different configurations, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.

Possible disadvantages of Dhall Configuration Language

  • Learning Curve
    While Dhall is designed to be simple, the presence of a type system and functional programming concepts can present a learning curve to new users, especially those without a programming background.
  • Tooling Support
    Compared to more established languages, Dhall has less tooling support. Users might find fewer IDE extensions, plugins, or community libraries to assist in development.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Being relatively new, Dhall has a smaller ecosystem that may lack the breadth of community contributions, such as templates and integration examples, found in more mature configuration languages.
  • Performance Overhead
    The type checking and interpretation of Dhall can introduce some performance overhead compared to more traditional configuration formats like JSON or YAML, which are simpler to parse.
  • Complexity for Simple Configurations
    For simple configurations, the added complexity of Dhall's type system and functional features may be unnecessary, leading to overhead without a clear benefit.

XML features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Dhall Configuration Language videos

No Dhall Configuration Language videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

XML videos

What is XML | XML Beginner Tutorial | Learn XML with Demo in 10 min

More videos:

  • Review - XML REview
  • Review - oXygen XML Editor - Review Panel

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Dhall Configuration Language and XML)
Configuration Management
84 84%
16% 16
Software Development
82 82%
18% 18
Developer Tools
81 81%
19% 19
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Dhall Configuration Language and XML. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Dhall Configuration Language seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 91 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Dhall Configuration Language mentions (91)

  • Any program can be a GitHub Actions shell
    I'll give a shot at some guiding principals: 1. Do not use yaml. All github action logic should be written in a language that compiles to yaml, for example dhall (https://dhall-lang.org/). Yaml is an awful language for programmers, and it's a worse language for non-programmers. It's good for no one. 2. To the greatest extent possible, do not use any actions which install things. For example, don't use... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
  • StrictYAML
    I'm a fan of anything that moves us away from stringly typed nonsense. See also Dhall (which can render to yaml). I like the idea but found the veneer broke a little too often and left me squinting at Haskell. https://dhall-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Some Programming Language Ideas
    I think you're asking for Starlark (https://starlark-lang.org), a language that strongly resembles Python but isn't Turing-complete, originally designed at Google for use in their build system. There's also Dhall (https://dhall-lang.org), which targets configuration use cases; I'm less familiar with it. One problem is that, while non-Turing-completeness can be helpful for maintainability, it's not really... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • 8 months of OCaml after 8 years of Haskell in production
    > Lambda calculus is as pure as can be, and also has terms that don't normalize. That is not considered a side effect. Many typed lambda calculi do normalise. You can also have a look https://dhall-lang.org/ for some pragmatic that normalises. > A better example of impurity in Haskell for pragmatic's sake is the trace function, that can be used to print debugging information from pure functions. Well, but that's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Thoughts on ThoughtWorks Radar 2024
    I was first turned onto Pkl during my Dhall Trough of Disillusionment phase (Dhall is cool, but man is it hard) by James Ward. It looked to be a language that had enough types to compile YAML/JSON configuration files wayyyy more safely. I’ve had enough YAML/JSON misconfigurations break production, that I started looking into ways to compile those problems away, and Dhall helped a lot, but the learning curve and... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

XML mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of XML yet. Tracking of XML recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Dhall Configuration Language and XML, you can also consider the following products

YAML - YAML 1.2 --- YAML: YAML Ain't Markup Language

Jsonnet - A powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

JSON - (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

Protobuf - Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.

Medium - Welcome to Medium, a place to read, write, and interact with the stories that matter most to you.