Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Design Collaboration for Product Teams VS Kitemaker

Compare Design Collaboration for Product Teams VS Kitemaker and see what are their differences

Project Burndown
Burndown is project management, automated. Our smart scheduling technology constantly manages your team's schedule - based on your priorities, progress, and capacity - so you don’t have to. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Design Collaboration for Product Teams logo Design Collaboration for Product Teams

Building the foundation of brilliance

Kitemaker logo Kitemaker

A fast issue tracker for makers and innovators
  • Design Collaboration for Product Teams Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • Kitemaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Design Collaboration for Product Teams and Kitemaker)

Design Collaboration for Product Teams

Kitemaker

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Productivity
6 6%
Productivity
94% 94
Prototyping
100 100%
Prototyping
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Design Collaboration for Product Teams and Kitemaker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitemaker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Design Collaboration for Product Teams mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Design Collaboration for Product Teams yet. Tracking of Design Collaboration for Product Teams recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Kitemaker mentions (13)

  • You Might Not Need a CRDT: Document Sync in the Wild [video]
    When we built Kitemaker [0] we elected to not use CRDTs. We built our sync engine after reading the blog article Figma wrote about they didn't need CRDTs because they have the server arbitrating any conflicts. We ended up taking the same approach. It's worked out very well for us though in a tool like our "last one in wins" generally works fine and doesn't lead to a lot of surprises. For documents, we had to do... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • How to write great one-pagers, PRDs, Specs, and more
    There is no one-size-fits-all approach to writing descriptions, so you need to figure out what works best for you and your team. However, seeing real-world examples might inspire you to find new ways to write them. Here are some examples from descriptions we have written for Kitemaker. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • free-for.dev
    Kitemaker.co - Collaborate through all phases of the product development process and keep track of work across Slack, Discord, Figma, and Github. Unlimited users, unlimited spaces. Free plan up to 250 work items. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Lessons learned from moving to Recoil.js
    At Kitemaker, we recently made the leap to Recoil.js for our React state management needs. Before using Recoil, Kitemaker used a simple state management solution built upon useReducer(). We built Kitemaker to be super fast, responding to every user interaction instantly. However, in organizations with lots of data, we sometimes had a difficult time achieving this due to unnecessary re-renders. Kitemaker has a sync... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Realtime: Multiplayer Edition
    Definitely feel your pain. We did a full OT implementation for our startup [0] and it was a beast. We based it on Slate.js which has a nice concept of operations that maps nicely to OT, but it was still a lot of work to get it working well (and there are still rough edges we try to improve all of the time). We did base it on Postgres in the backend so really looking forward to what the Supabase team comes up with... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Design Collaboration for Product Teams and Kitemaker, you can also consider the following products

Abstract - A secure, version-controlled hub for your design files

Linear - Streamlined issue tracking for software teams

Figma - Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.

Trello - Infinitely flexible. Incredibly easy to use. Great mobile apps. It's free. Trello keeps track of everything, from the big picture to the minute details.

Adobe CC + Slack Integration - Work better together with CC on Slack

Asana - Asana project management is an effort to re-imagine how we work together, through modern productivity software. Fast and versatile, Asana helps individuals and groups get more done.

Loading...